Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In numerous parts of the world girls and boys studing in co education system some people thinks that both sexuals benefit from being educated seprately in single sex schools .At some points i really prefer to study in single secual schools .

In my opinion the peoples are correct at some points because when girls and boys used to studing together so their intrest rate began to fall rapidly due to their activities. They began to compare themselve in study or in other physicall acitivties actually i want to say that there are a lot of couples in universities and collages even in schools because of this co education so their intrest automatically changed about studies to personal life and affairs .Even the teachers behaviour is also affected .

Their passion ,dreams,goals everything is badly affected due to their emotinal attachment with their partners .

lets talk about the single sex education schools or collages so the students reallys try to achive whatever they want in tbeir physicall life and really struglle moreover they work hard to achive their goals they study with determination because they want prsperity in their personal life and they have no interset about thier life partners or opposite gender .

Thats the reason i really prefer to study in single sex educayion system actually i have my own example when i used to study with my female friend so at that time i really focused more on my dress and shoes even i had less concentrate on my study programes .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You give a clear preference for single-sex education, and the personal example about focusing on clothes and shoes around a female friend is relevant to the question. You also offer reasons, including distraction from studies and the possibility of concentrating on goals. However, the response addresses the issue only partially: it mainly presents one side and does not explain the extent of your agreement in a balanced or precise way. Claims such as students’ “passion, dreams, goals” being badly affected are broad and need explanation or evidence. Develop the reasoning by showing how single-sex schooling may help some students, while acknowledging that mixed schools can also support social skills or academic focus. A clearer, more fully supported position would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is some organisation: you begin with your view, give reasons against co-education, then discuss single-sex schools and finish with a personal example. This gives the reader a basic route through your argument. However, progression is not consistently clear, and the response is presented as one long paragraph rather than distinct stages. Several ideas are joined in extended sentences, especially the discussion of couples and their effect on studies, making relationships between points difficult to follow. Linking phrases such as “moreover” and “that’s the reason” are attempted, but connections are sometimes abrupt or repetitive. Use separate paragraphs for your position, supporting reasons, and example, and make each paragraph develop one main point with clear references.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use some vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “co-education,” “single-sex schools,” “determination,” and “goals,” so the main subject is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several words or phrases are repeated, particularly “study,” “really,” and “achieve.” Frequent spelling errors, such as “studing,” “seprately,” “intrest,” and “emotinal,” make the writing less fluent and can slow the reader. Some choices are also imprecise: “both sexuals” is not an appropriate way to refer to girls and boys, and “physicall life” does not clearly express your meaning. Build a more accurate topic vocabulary and check spelling and collocations carefully; this will make your ideas easier to understand.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt some longer sentences to explain cause and effect, but the range of sentence structures is limited and these attempts are often difficult to control. Errors in verb forms and agreement appear in phrases such as “some people thinks,” “used to studing,” and “their intrest rate began to fall.” Sentence boundaries and punctuation are also frequently unclear: the opening runs several ideas together, and the sentence beginning “Even the teachers behaviour” is not complete. These problems sometimes make the intended relationships between ideas hard to follow. Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then combine them using clauses such as “because” or “although.” Check subject–verb agreement, verb patterns, articles, and full stops when editing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.