Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Co-education is a highly debated topic in recent years. Some argue that students can benefit more by studying separately. I strongly disagree with this view, while separate education has its own advantages, but, the nourishment young pupil receive through mixed-schooling are far better comparatively.

The main advantage of being a part of a co-education system is that, it opens doors in one's personality trait which separate schooling never would. Professionally, someone who leaves a co-education system have better communication skills and can easily converse to the opposite gender. Research suggest that, people tend to open up more when they have to converse with the opposite sex, which allows them to be more confident and lively naturally. Aditionally, students who were a part of mixed-schooling tend to be more respectful towards the other sex and respect their boundaries.

Admittedly, there are some advantages of separate sex schooling as well such as being more focus with study due to the never ending competition between the same sex but this can easily be achieved in a mixed-school as well through enough encouragement and guidance from tutors. Another noticeable trait in the students from seprate schools are their long last friendships, however, this is mainly depended on personality of the students.

In conculsion, being a part of mixed-schooling system usually brings confidence and respect towards the opposite gender which can not be achieved by minimum interaction opportunities in a single-sex schooling environment. I firmly agree with the fact that students gain more when they are a part of co-education system.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction and conclusion: you disagree that single-sex schools offer greater benefits, and you give relevant reasons about communication, confidence and respect. You also acknowledge the opposing view by mentioning focus and friendships, then explain why these benefits are not exclusive to single-sex schools. This covers the task well. However, some ideas are asserted rather than fully supported: the claim that research shows students open up more is not explained or illustrated, and the point about lasting friendships receives only a brief qualification. To strengthen the response further, develop each main reason with a specific example or clearer explanation, while keeping the comparison between the two school types explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear overall progression: an introduction states your view, the next paragraphs present supporting and opposing points, and the conclusion restates your position. Paragraphing is appropriate, and transitions such as “Admittedly” and “In conclusion” help signal the argument’s stages. The contrast between the benefits of mixed schooling and the possible advantages of separate schooling is also easy to follow. Some connections within sentences are less controlled, particularly the introduction’s “I strongly disagree with this view, while…” construction, which makes the relationship between ideas unclear. A few points, such as the claim about friendships, are introduced but not linked back to the central comparison in much detail. Use clearer sentence-level links and develop each paragraph’s central point before moving on.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “co-education,” “opposite gender,” “boundaries,” “competition,” and “encouragement and guidance.” These choices make your position understandable, and phrases such as “open doors” show an attempt to use more expressive language. However, several noticeable spelling and word-choice or collocation problems reduce precision: “nourishment” does not naturally describe educational benefits, “converse to” is not the usual collocation, and “long last friendships” is incorrectly formed. There are also misspellings such as “Aditionally,” “seprate,” and “conculsion.” Aim for accurate, natural academic phrasing and proofread carefully; a smaller set of well-controlled expressions will be more effective than awkward or inaccurate choices.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including a concession (“Admittedly, there are some advantages…”) and a relative clause (“which allows them to be more confident…”). The main argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make sentence relationships unclear. For example, “I strongly disagree with this view, while separate education has its own advantages, but…” combines contrasting linkers in one sentence. There are also agreement and form errors in “the nourishment young pupil receive” and “Research suggest,” as well as article and preposition problems in “a part of a co-education system” and “converse to.” Work on sentence boundaries, subject–verb agreement, and article use, then check each sentence for one clear grammatical structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.