Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The debate over whether boys and girls should be educated together has intensified. some individuals believe that educating them separately in single sex schools is more beneficial. I partially disagree with this view because co-education allows learners to know their limits.

On the one hand, single sex schools are ideal for learners who are shy and feel intimidated by the other gender. This schools allow learners to be free while doing activities. For instance, a girl who has started experiencing her monthly periods for the first time may feel ashamed to walk around or even ask for help if the institution is a mixed school. However, if its a single sex school, the learner will feel free because all learners may undergo the same experience at some point in their stay there. As a result, learning becomes easier because the environment is friendly to the learners.

On the other hand, mixed schools help learners to interact with both genders. This is beneficial because students do not find it difficult to associate with others in the outside world. For example, adolescents may easily spot how the other gender reacts when they want something from them. This helps them discern genuine friendship from friends who want to use them.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is stated clearly: you “partially disagree” with single-sex education, and you address both sides with relevant examples. The point about a student feeling embarrassed about menstruation explains a possible benefit of single-sex schools, while your discussion of interaction in mixed schools supports your view. However, the second argument is less fully developed: the claim that adolescents can distinguish genuine friendship from people who may use them needs clearer explanation and a more direct link to the benefits of co-education. The response also does not meet the required minimum length, which limits the opportunity to develop your reasons and support your position. Add a fuller explanation and another specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, a paragraph presenting the case for single-sex schools, and a contrasting paragraph supporting mixed education. The signposts “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” make the shift between arguments easy to follow, and examples generally appear beside the points they illustrate. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some of the stronger progression associated with the next level. To make that progression more complete, develop the conclusion and connect the final example more explicitly to your main position. Some links are also repetitive or slightly mechanical; vary the transitions and use clearer references where “This” could refer to more than one idea.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary to discuss the topic, including “intimidated,” “associate,” and “discern,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “genuine friendship,” although some phrasing is imprecise or unnatural. For example, “know their limits” does not clearly express the intended benefit of learning to interact appropriately, and “spot how the other gender reacts” is informal and vague. “Single sex” should be written as “single-sex,” and “This schools” is an inaccurate word choice/form. Aim for more precise academic collocations and avoid repeating “learners” when “students” or “pupils” would fit. These improvements would make your vocabulary more flexible and controlled.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure in “if it’s a single sex school” and a longer sentence beginning “For instance.” Most sentences communicate their meaning, but some grammatical and punctuation errors remain. For example, “This schools allow” has a subject–verb agreement error, and “a girl who has started experiencing…” needs a clearer grammatical connection to the main clause. Capitalisation is also inconsistent: the second sentence begins “some,” and “I” should be capitalised in “if its a single sex school.” The apostrophe is needed in “it’s” when meaning “it is.” Check agreement, sentence boundaries, and punctuation carefully while continuing to use complex clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.