Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

All around the world, It is a trends and effective way of taught students in a same school. It is argued that students should study according to their gender-based school. I completely disagree with that idea that students should be taught separately.

There are numerous reasons why student should not learn seperately according to gender. It is not required gender to work or study to be done so it is not necessarily important to divide them into two part. One possible reason is, students make a strong bonding while studing at the class. To keep them separate, a nation has to build more school ian a aria which consume more land. For the densely populated cities, it creat lots of difficulties. Teaching them in the same school area can help them understand each other. They can communicate firmly and learn about there opposite gender in a convinient way.

In addition, It will be helpful for future generations. Boys are physically stronger and they can understand about the thing that which sector is preferable for them or which not. Furthermore, It can prevent of gender discrimination among them. For instance, interacting every day can help them to learn about each other. It also inspire the to work in a group that is needed for every individual life in future workplace because the person who get shy and nervous in while talking opposite gender must face difficulties. Furthermore, In can help to lessen social problems associated with genders. Without teaching them with each other, these advantages will not be attained.

In conclusion, considering the factors discussed above, I believe they should not learn individually but alongside each other.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you “completely disagree” with educating students separately, and the conclusion restates this view. You also give relevant reasons, including communication between genders, practical difficulties of building separate schools, and preparation for future workplaces. However, the response only partly develops the task: the claim that boys are physically stronger does not clearly support your argument, and the point about gender discrimination is asserted rather than explained. The prompt asks to what extent students benefit from single-sex education, so directly acknowledging any possible benefit before explaining why you consider co-education more valuable would make the response more complete. Develop each main reason with a clear explanation or a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Paragraphs are broadly organised around reasons for co-education, and linking expressions such as “In addition,” “For instance” and “In conclusion” help signal movement between points. However, progression within the body paragraphs is uneven: the first moves from school construction to bonding and communication, while the second combines physical strength, discrimination, workplace interaction and social problems without clearly connecting them. Some references, such as “It” and “these advantages,” are not always easy to match to a specific idea. Group related points together, use clearer topic sentences, and make each supporting sentence explain the point immediately before it.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “gender discrimination,” “densely populated cities,” “interacting” and “future workplace.” This gives you a basic range for discussing education and social relationships. However, vocabulary is often imprecise or incorrectly formed, which sometimes makes the intended meaning difficult to follow: “a trends,” “study according to their gender-based school,” and “lessen social problems associated with genders” are examples. Spelling errors such as “seperately,” “studing” and “convinient” are also noticeable. Aim to learn common collocations as complete phrases and check word forms and spelling. More precise expressions would help you explain your ideas without relying on repeated general terms such as “help” and “thing.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a reason clause beginning “because” and a conditional structure with “Without teaching them…”. However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence construction, agreement, articles and verb forms frequently make reading difficult. For example, “It is a trends” has incorrect agreement, while “students make a strong bonding while studing at the class” contains problems with the article and sentence pattern. The sentence beginning “Boys are physically stronger and they can understand about the thing that which sector…” is especially difficult to interpret because its clauses are not joined clearly. Practise building accurate basic sentences first, then add one subordinate clause at a time. Check subject–verb agreement, articles and punctuation when editing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.