Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-31

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience. Write at least 250 words.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, co-education is very common in many countries. Few individuals argue that, educating girls and boys seperately is more effective. I completely diasgree with the following view, as children being familiar with the opposite gender has far greater advantages such as being prepared for workplace environment and getting similar education.

First of all, in the job sector men and women have to work together. There is no certain work opportunity that is reserved only for male or female. If a person has already studied in a institute where girls and boys are taught together, they would not face any additional problem, while adapting to the work environment. On the oher hand, when a person is not used to being around the opposite gender they would feel uncomfortable and this could affect their work and mental health. For example, a girl who has studied in a co-education set up might communicate with her male collegues more effectively, as she is accumstated to it. While the other girl who went to a single-sex school might be more shy.

Moreover, if girls and boys go to the same school and learn together, they will get similar benefits. In many parts of the world girls' education is seen as less important than boys. In this case, if their institutes are different the school that is assigned for girls could face biases or get less financial support. For example, the government could prioritize funding the school for boys before. This could further fuel the discrimination.

To sum it up, educating girls and boys have no additional benefit. While having children study together could prepare them for future and reduce the discriminations and biases.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree with single-sex education and give two relevant reasons—preparation for mixed-gender workplaces and the risk of unequal resources for girls’ schools. These points address the question, and the workplace example helps illustrate your first reason. However, the second argument is less fully explained: you suggest that separate schools could receive unequal funding, but do not show why co-education itself would prevent this or consider circumstances in which single-sex education might benefit students. The conclusion also says co-education can reduce discrimination, a claim that would be stronger if linked explicitly to the funding argument. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation of how it supports your position, and briefly acknowledge the opposing view before responding to it.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a concluding summary. Sequencing phrases such as “First of all,” “Moreover,” and “To sum it up” make the progression easy to follow, and each body paragraph has a recognisable central idea. This meets the lower-band expectations securely and shows some features of stronger organisation. However, a few links are mechanical or unclear. “On the other hand” introduces a contrast, but the relationship between the two workplace situations could be stated more precisely; “While the other girl…” is also a fragment rather than a complete linked sentence. The transition from unequal funding to the conclusion’s claim about reducing discrimination needs a more explicit explanation. Use cohesive devices selectively and make the logical links between claims clearer.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your main ideas, including “co-education,” “work environment,” “financial support,” and “discrimination.” There are also attempts at more specific phrasing, such as “reserved only for male or female” and “fuel the discrimination.” However, noticeable spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural collocations limit the accuracy and flexibility of the vocabulary: examples include “seperately,” “oher,” “collegues,” and “accumstated.” Phrases such as “similar benefits” and “additional benefit” are also vague in context, while “a co-education set up” is not a natural expression. These issues do not prevent the reader from understanding the argument, but they make it less precise. Check spelling carefully and learn common collocations for education, employment, and equality.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional forms (“If a person has already studied…”) and a relative clause (“a girl who has studied…”). Most of the argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors and sentence-boundary problems reduce accuracy. For example, “Few individuals argue that, educating…” has an unnecessary comma and an awkward clause structure; “in a institute” has an article error; and “educating girls and boys have no additional benefit” has a subject–verb agreement problem. “While the other girl…” is an incomplete sentence, and the final sentence beginning “While having children…” is also a fragment. Practise checking articles, agreement, and complete sentence structure, especially when using “while” and “if” clauses. More consistently accurate complex sentences would strengthen the response.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.