Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-18
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The line graph below shows past and current overweight rates, as well as a projected future overweight rate in nine selected countries.
Summarise the infonnation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Past and projected future overweight rates in selected OECD countries
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The line graph illustrates the proportion of overweight rates in the past as well in future for nine different countries.
Overall, all countries had overweight rate below half until the early 2000s while, the USA is projecting higher rate of overwieght, Korea expecting lowest overweight rate in future.
It can be clearly seen that, the USA had an overweight below 50% around 1970. While it is projected to have the highest overweight around 75% by the year 2030. Additionally korea has lowest overweight around 30% in 200s, but it is projected to have the overweight around 35% in year 2030.
Furthermore, countries like Canada, England and Spain was around 50% from year 200s to 2010.which expected to around 55% in future, but England have second highest overwight less than 5% than USA. While countries like Austria, Italy , France and Australia had overweight ratios between 30% to in the year around 1990 and 2010, these are projected to reached around 45% by the year 2030.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response attempts to cover the main features of the line graph, identifying general trends such as the higher rates projected for the USA and lower figures for Korea. An overview is provided, noting that overweight rates were generally below half in earlier decades. However, there are several inaccuracies and vague statements in the data reporting. For instance, the student refers to the year '200s' and '2030' (whereas the chart ends at 2020), and groups several countries with inaccurate numerical ranges (e.g., stating Austria, Italy, France, and Australia had ratios between 30% in the year around 1990 and 2010). The information is sometimes imprecise, placing the response at Band 5.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The response is divided into paragraphs, attempting an introduction, an overview, and separate body paragraphs for specific data points. However, the logical progression is frequently disrupted by confusing phrasing, abrupt transitions, and referencing issues (such as 'countries like Canada, England and Spain was around 50%'). Cohesive devices are used awkwardly or inaccurately, and punctuation errors often obscure how sentences relate to one another. Paragraphing is attempted but lacks internal cohesion, leading to an overall score of 5.0.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is relatively basic and repetitive, with frequent word-choice errors and spelling mistakes (e.g., 'overwieght', 'korea' instead of capitalised Korea, 'reaches' spelled as 'reached'). There are attempts to use less common vocabulary like 'projected' and 'proportion', but inaccuracies in collocation and form (such as 'overweight rate below half' or 'second highest overwight less than 5% than USA') restrict the range and occasionally impede clear communication. This performance aligns with Band 5.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but control over grammar and punctuation is weak throughout. There are frequent grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('countries like Canada, England and Spain was'), missing articles, incorrect prepositions ('in year 2030'), and ungrammatical fragments ('which expected to around 55% in future'). Punctuation is also problematic, with misplaced commas and run-on structures. Because errors are frequent and often cause difficulty for the reader, a band score of 5.0 is appropriate.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
