Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-23

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph below shows past and current overweight rates, as well as a projected future overweight rate in nine selected countries.

Summarise the infonnation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Past and projected future overweight rates in selected OECD countries

Past and projected future overweight rates in selected OECD countries

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The linear graph illustrates the proportion of obese people of nine selected nations over the period in 1970 and also the projected future in 2020 .

Overall, the graph shows an upward trend ,USA had drastically increased in 1980 and it will expected to grow till 2020.The least growth in proportion overweight people had seen in Austria ,but it might increase in upcoming years.

In 1970, USA had a decline of nearly 3% ,but the population had climbed frim 1980 to 2010,and expected to reach above 70% till 2020. In the mid of 1980,Spain had nearly 42% and rose steadily till 2000, after a minor drop it expected to reach more than 50% .

Meanwhile in 1990 ,England stood for around 48% and France accounted for 30% ,but after some fluctuations it reached more than 60% and 40% in coming years .In contrast, in the mid of 1990, canada and Italy had a round 50% obese population and also expected to grew till 2020, Whereas Austria remained stagnant till 2000 and steadily increase its proportion to nearly 45% in mid of 2000 ,and it will projected to grow in future as well.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response attempts to cover the main features of the line graph showing past and projected overweight rates in selected OECD countries, but it suffers from significant data inaccuracies and confusion regarding the timeline. For instance, the text states that in 1970 the USA had a decline of nearly 3%, which misreads the data points where the USA started at 45% in 1972 and generally increased. The overview identifies an upward trend, but the selection of data is erratic and mixes up countries and dates (e.g. Canada and Italy are incorrectly said to have had around 50% obese population in the mid-1990s when the chart shows lower figures). While some general comparisons and trends are mentioned, the lack of factual precision and weak overview prevent the response from achieving a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response shows some organizational structure with an introductory sentence and paragraph divisions, but the progression of ideas is frequently unclear and disjointed. Cohesive devices are either missing or misused, leading to a mechanical and confusing flow (e.g. 'Meanwhile in 1990', 'In contrast'). Paragraphing is attempted, but the grouping of information within the body paragraphs lacks logical cohesion, jumping randomly between countries and years without a clear structuring strategy. Referencing is also sometimes unclear, which strains the reader's ability to follow the comparisons smoothly.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is generally basic and repetitive, with several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors (e.g. 'linear graph' instead of 'line graph', 'proportion overweight people', 'the population had climbed', 'stood for around 48%'). There are also spelling and word-formation errors such as 'frim' instead of 'from', 'expected to grew' instead of 'grow', and 'will projected'. The lexical range is minimally adequate to convey basic trends, but frequent errors in word choice and form restrict the score to band 5.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty. There are persistent grammatical errors throughout, particularly concerning tense consistency and modal verbs (e.g. 'USA had drastically increased in 1980 and it will expected to grow', 'it expected to reach', 'it will projected'). Punctuation errors, such as spaces before commas and periods, are also present. While the meaning can generally be extracted with some effort, the high frequency of grammatical inaccuracies pulls the score down.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.