Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-24
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The line graph below shows past and current overweight rates, as well as a projected future overweight rate in nine selected countries.
Summarise the infonnation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Past and projected future overweight rates in selected OECD countries
Student answer (Band 4.0)
The line graph demonstrates the valuable times past and apparently overloaded rates, in addition, the plan will overweighted rate in nine chose countries. The are some countries, the times were begin enhanced by many countries such as, USA, France, Korea, and Canada.
Overall, the projected both times modify over-higher calculates in selected nine international areas in 1970 from 2020.
In the US, the projected in the last years in 1970 was 50% and, it reached at maximum highest point 79% 2020 rather than other decades. As well as in the past, the concept of projected in England, that was minimum selection 45%, while in the 1980, 1990, and 2020, it was similar highest point with US 78%
The chosen projection over rates in past and future during 1970, 1980, 2010, Toronto area of Canada extremely lower than other countries.
Since due to didn't concentrate projected selected highest rate at Korea , it was declined very lowest with compared another countries in both past and future.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.0 |
| Overall | 4.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5
The response attempts to address the line graph showing past and projected future overweight rates in selected countries, but it falls significantly short of a coherent and accurate summary. Key features, such as general upward trends and specific data points, are misread or heavily distorted. For instance, the student claims that the US rate in 1970 was 50% and reached 79% in 2020, whereas the chart shows 45% in 1972 and 74% in 2020. Furthermore, data references are frequently vague, confusing countries with cities (e.g., "Toronto area of Canada"), and fail to provide a clear, accurate overview of the main trends across the nine countries. Consequently, the task response is only partially effective.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0
The logical organization and progression of the text are weak. The response lacks proper paragraphing, presenting a series of loosely connected, difficult-to-follow sentences instead of a structured overview and body paragraphs. Cohesive devices are either misused or absent, resulting in a disjointed structure where relationships between ideas and data points are obscure. For example, transition phrases like "As well as in the past" and "Since due to didn't concentrate" fail to create logical links. Referencing is also unclear, making it hard for the reader to follow which country or year is being discussed.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.0
The vocabulary used is extremely limited, repetitive, and frequently incorrect or unnatural. Terms related to the graph are misused throughout, such as "overloaded rates," "overweighted rate," "times past," and "international areas." There is an inability to control word choice or collocations when describing statistical data (e.g., "modify over-higher calculates," "minimum selection," and "declined very lowest"). These severe lexical inaccuracies and awkward phrasings constantly strain the reader and impede clear communication.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0
Grammatical control is very weak, with frequent errors across almost every sentence that severely distort meaning. The response lacks a reliable range of complex structures, and attempts at complex clauses invariably result in ungrammatical formations, such as "Since due to didn't concentrate projected selected highest rate at Korea , it was declined very lowest with compared another countries." Tense usage is confused when discussing past and projected future data, and punctuation and word order errors are pervasive throughout the text.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
