Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph below shows past and current overweight rates, as well as a projected future overweight rate in nine selected countries.

Summarise the infonnation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Past and projected future overweight rates in selected OECD countries

Past and projected future overweight rates in selected OECD countries

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given graph illustrates the Past and Projected overweight rates of the citizens residing in OECD countries from 1970 to 2020.

Overall, we can state that mostly all OECD Countries shows a projected surge in overweight people by the year 2020 however, there is significant rise in people who might be overweight in the progressive time in countries like the USA, England and Australia.

In the year 1970, we can observe that approximately 45% people were overweight but there was slight drop in the year 1980 however, it only rose up from that point and by the year 2020, the proportion surged upto 75% people who were projected overweight. Similarily, Countries like Australia and England projected similar patterns. In the year 1990 Australia was recorded around 33% which by 2020 soared upto 63% whilst, England was initially recorded at a high percentage of 45% in 1990 but rose to 70% in 2020.

Other countries also showed an inclined graph such as Korea, France, Italy, Austria, Spain and Canada but the data was not overwhelming though, it did projected a rise in people who might suffer with obesity. For instance, Korea initially only had 25% of people who were recorded overweight but the proportions increased to 35% approximately. However, France graph kept fluctuating with dips frequently in between the years from 1990 to 2010. The graphs of countries such as Italy, Austria, Spain and Canada did not posses any changes and remained under 60% compared to any other OECD countries.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The student successfully identifies the main trends and overviews the data provided in the line graph, noting general increases across the board alongside specific notable rises in countries like the USA, England, and Australia. The response attempts to make relevant comparisons, such as contrasting countries with higher rates against those remaining under 60%, like Italy, Austria, and Spain. However, some of the data reported contains minor inaccuracies compared to the source material—for instance, stating that Australia was recorded around 33% in 1990 when the chart indicates 34%, and suggesting rates reached 75% for the USA. Despite these small discrepancies in data retrieval, all parts of the prompt are addressed, fulfilling the requirements for Band 6.5 to 7.0.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response is logically organized with a clear overall progression, moving from an introductory overview into body paragraphs detailing specific country trends and lower-rate nations. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate different groups of data. Cohesive devices are employed to connect ideas, such as "however," "similarily," and "whilst," although some referencing is occasionally mechanical or repetitive. For example, transition phrases are sometimes forced or slightly misused as in "however, it only rose up from that point." Overall arrangement is coherent, earning a solid Band 6.0.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary suitable for an Academic Task 1 response, employing terms such as "proportion," "surge," "fluctuating," and "projected." There are, however, several lexical and collocational errors throughout the text. Words are sometimes misused or slightly awkward in context, such as "progressive time" instead of a period of time, "inclined graph" instead of an upward trend, and spelling/capitalization slips like "Similarily" and "posses." The vocabulary is sufficient to convey the main points clearly, but the presence of noticeable word-choice inaccuracies keeps this criterion at Band 6.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing relative clauses and subordinate conjunctions effectively in places. However, frequent grammatical and punctuation errors occur throughout the response. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ("mostly all OECD Countries shows"), incorrect preposition usage, and run-on structures without proper punctuation (e.g., "...by the year 2020 however, there is significant rise..."). While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to prevent the grammar score from reaching Band 6.5, placing it securely at Band 6.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.