Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-18

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph below shows past and current overweight rates, as well as a projected future overweight rate in nine selected countries.

Summarise the infonnation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Past and projected future overweight rates in selected OECD countries

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The line graph illustrates the information about the past and present ongoing overweight rates, also pedicted future rate in different selected countries.

Overall, USA has higher rate proportion for whole time period. In 19s it had between 40 to 50 percent of overweight. However, it has rose significantly with above 70% percent.

In 1970 to 1990, America had increased the proportion untill 60% while English countries such as Canada, Spain and England were started their rate just after 1980. Austria was not the participant in rate untill 1980 and engaged from 1980s. Among all english countires England was dominated other regions counted by 50% to almost 70% near with the USA according with the past and future overweight rates among OECD states.

Since then, 2000 to 2020 every country have been consequently increased rate except Italy, Spain although from two from 2000 to 2010 Italy was remained on constant proportion which was rougly 40%, but Spain slighly reduced from 50 to may be 46%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify the USA as the highest series and note its substantial rise, and you attempt to compare England with other countries. However, the overview is incomplete and some key claims do not match the graph. The USA does not remain highest throughout: it begins around 45%, below some later-starting countries, and is highest in the later years. The statement that every country rose from 2000 to 2020 is too broad, while Italy is described as flat despite rising overall, and Spain’s supposed fall from 50% to 46% is inaccurate; it increases to about 55%. Several countries, including Australia, France and Korea, are omitted. Select the clearest overall patterns and support them with accurate comparisons.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has separate paragraphs and uses basic sequencing phrases such as “Overall,” “In 1970 to 1990,” and “Since then,” so there is some organisation. However, the progression is difficult to follow because the discussion shifts between periods and countries without a consistent comparison plan. The long third paragraph combines several claims, and phrases such as “Among all english countires” do not clearly identify which countries or figures are being compared. The final paragraph also contains a confusing contrast between Italy and Spain. Group the data into a clear overview followed by chronological or regional comparisons, and use precise references such as “these countries” only when the referent is unmistakable.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “proportion,” “significantly,” “constant,” and “overweight rates,” which helps communicate the topic. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, making parts of the report hard to interpret. For example, “higher rate proportion” is redundant, “English countries” is not an appropriate label for England, Canada and Spain, and “engaged from 1980s” does not clearly describe a series beginning. Spelling errors such as “pedicted,” “untill,” “countires,” and “rougly” are also noticeable. Aim for precise trend language and country names, for example “the proportion rose” and “the rate remained stable.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a range of sentence forms, including a contrast with “However” and a longer sentence beginning “Since then,” but complex constructions are often faulty and errors occur frequently. Examples include “it has rose” instead of a correct present-perfect form, “every country have” instead of subject–verb agreement, and “Italy was remained” where the passive construction is not grammatical. The sentence about countries “were started their rate” also has an incorrect verb pattern. Tense use is inconsistent when describing past data, and some sentences lack clear grammatical structure, which can make the intended comparisons difficult to understand. Practise simple, accurate past-tense statements before combining them into longer sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.