Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Science has become an inevitable part of our everyday life. Improving the livelihood of people should be the most crucial goal of science. I strongly agree with this statement because science makes people life more convenient if people do not misuse science.

Science has been using as a solution of people’s daily life challenges. From waking up at morning till late night, people using the innovation of science. Science has introduced artificial intelligency, modern technology to make life easier. People now become dependent on science in their home, education, offices, and transportation. Individuals use machines that makes household chores more easier such as washing machine, dryer, electric cooker, and so on. Thus, these allows people to take rest after completing their work fastly. Companies increase their productivity by introducing modern technology in their workplaces. People now use GPS tracker to find out the unknown route or use electric motorbikes to reduce pollution.

However, science can become a curse for people if it is misused. Many countries using scientific knowledge to create explosive equipments such as atom bomb, nuclear bomb. And they use it in negative purposes. Herosima and Nagasaki are the best examples for this harmful consequences. When nuclear atom bomb exploited in these regions, many people died, and those who survived had a long term impact in their life. Thus, science should be used in positive ways.

In my opinion, science should be aimed for improving people’s lives by introducing innovative approaches. Using science in a negative way should be banned. The main purpose of science should include the well-being of people.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you strongly agree that science should improve people’s lives, while recognising that misuse can cause harm. The response addresses the prompt with relevant examples, including household appliances, GPS, workplace technology and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These examples support the central argument, and the conclusion returns to the idea of human well-being. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained. For instance, the benefits of technology at work and the claim that harmful uses should be banned could be developed with clearer reasoning or a specific example. The discussion of misuse is also narrower than the discussion of everyday benefits. More balanced development would make the argument more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, the body paragraphs discuss benefits and risks, and the conclusion restates your position. The contrast signalled by “However” helps readers follow the shift from positive uses to harmful ones, and examples generally appear in relevant places. To strengthen progression, organise each paragraph around a more explicit main point and explain how each example supports it. The benefits paragraph moves quickly from household appliances to companies, GPS and electric motorbikes, so the links between these examples can feel list-like. Some connections are also unclear, such as “Thus, these allows people,” where the reference is not precise. Use cohesive devices selectively and make references to earlier ideas unmistakable.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “artificial intelligence,” “productivity,” “GPS,” “nuclear bomb” and “well-being,” which makes the subject clear. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “the most crucial goal” and “innovative approaches.” However, several word choices, collocations and word forms are inaccurate or unnatural: “improving the livelihood of people,” “electric motorbikes to reduce pollution,” and “explosive equipments” do not express the intended ideas precisely. Spelling errors such as “intelligency” and “Herosima” also reduce accuracy. Aim for natural collocations and check spelling and countability; this will make your vocabulary more precise while preserving the relevant range you already show.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional idea in “if people do not misuse science” and a relative clause in “machines that makes household chores…”. The overall meaning is usually understandable, but some errors in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence construction remain. For example, “Science has been using as a solution” needs a passive form, while “people using the innovation” lacks a finite verb. In “these allows,” the verb does not agree with its subject, and “a long term impact” needs a hyphen when used as a compound modifier. Review sentence completeness, subject–verb agreement and article use, then proofread punctuation around sentence openings such as “And they use it…”. Greater control would make your varied structures more consistently clear.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.