Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Science is plays a very important role in our daily life.some people understand that the main purpose of science should be to improve people lives.I completely agree with the statement because science has improved health,and education,and continues to make our life safer.

First of all,science has greatly improved people health and increase their life expect.In the past ,many people died from simple disease because there no medicines and vaccines. Today because scientific research,doctors can treat dangerous disease cancer sugar and heart problems.For example,during covid -19 scientific made vaccines in a very short time and vaccine saved millions of lives.This show that science has saved many lives.

Secondly,science has made communication and education vert easily .mobile phone and internet invention people can to talk their family in any part of the world second.students can also study online classes. For example In my village many student use you tube and google online classes prepare for ielts and other exams.

In conclusion,science is good for us.it makes our life easy and save our lives. Science help us in every field of life. science plays a very important role in our life.some people believe that the main purpose pf science should be to make people lives better,

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you completely agree that science should improve people’s lives, and you give relevant reasons involving health, communication and education. The examples of COVID-19 vaccines and students using online resources help connect your points to real situations. However, the ideas are only briefly explained: for instance, you mention treatment for several illnesses but do not explain how this illustrates science’s wider priorities. The conclusion repeats the main claim rather than drawing the reasons together, and the final sentence repeats an earlier idea. The response also does not meet the required 250-word minimum, so there is limited space to develop the argument. Extend each main point with explanation and a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs signalled by “First of all” and “Secondly,” and a conclusion. This makes the main line of argument easy to identify. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes abrupt, and links between claims and examples are not always clear. For example, the communication point moves quickly from mobile phones to online classes and then to your village without explaining the connection in detail. The conclusion repeats the claim that science improves lives and adds another version of the opening statement. Use clearer links between each reason, its explanation and its example, and avoid repeating the same point at the end.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “scientific research,” “vaccines,” “online classes” and “dangerous disease.” However, the range is limited and several word-choice, spelling and collocation errors make parts of the response less natural or occasionally difficult to understand. Examples include “life expect” for “life expectancy,” “scientific made vaccines” and “communication and education vert easily.” Some key words, such as “life” and “science,” are repeated frequently. Build a wider set of accurate phrases for health, technology and education, and check spelling and word forms before submitting. More precise vocabulary will make your examples clearer.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, and the reader can generally follow your main argument. However, the range of structures is limited, and errors occur frequently in basic sentence formation, verb forms, agreement, articles and punctuation. For example, “Science is plays” combines incompatible verb forms, while “mobile phone and internet invention people can to talk” lacks a clear grammatical structure. In “This show that science has saved many lives,” the subject and verb do not agree. Sentence boundaries and spacing after full stops are also inconsistent. Practise building accurate subject–verb–object sentences first, then add subordinate clauses using forms such as “because” and “which.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.