Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given topic is very important and have a deep effect on our daily lives.It is a general perception that the modern technology has changed the world in a positive manner which is also true to some extent.

Science has changed our lives alot in different manners.I have a strong opinion regarding how the specific technology or scientific discovery should effect a individuals daily life.From my perspective i strongly agree that scientific researches and experiments should solely focus on making the world a better place.

The reason for me having this particular opinion is due to the inventions and facilities provided by scientists in the past.Those have changed the way we live today and has caused betterment for our lives.The science should excel more towards technologies that can cause a positive change in someone's life.

Moreover,I have to mention the misuse of technology as well over the past decade.It is an alarming thing that must be addressed and should be countered before it's too late.Today's world has seen a paradigm shift of technology from being used to help and make lives easy towards making war machines and causing chaos.

I have always been a devoter of science and its capabilities to do good.I have helped many people of my age and many elders as well with the use of different technologies and have made their lives easy by connecting them to the new world of endless possibilities.I clearly remember this one time,I was just a teenager during that time when i saw one of my neighbour crying and he was soo worried about his son who just went abroad for higher studies.I helped through technology and connected him with his son by a video call about which he never knew before.

To cut the story short,I firmly believe science should only aim towards the idea of improving a persons life and helping him in his daily life tasks by providing new helpful technologies.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you strongly agree that science should improve people’s lives, and you give relevant support through examples of beneficial inventions, the misuse of technology in warfare, and your video-call story. This addresses the question, but the ideas are not developed equally. The discussion of past inventions remains general, and the point about war machines is raised without explaining how it relates to science’s most important aim or what limits should be placed on research. The personal example is vivid, but its connection to the broader argument could be made more explicit. To strengthen the response, explain why improving lives should take priority while acknowledging whether science may also have other legitimate aims.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has an overall structure, moving from an introduction and stated opinion to supporting points and a conclusion. Paragraphing helps separate the main ideas, and transitions such as “Moreover” and “To cut the story short” signal movement between them. However, progression is sometimes mechanical, and some links between ideas are unclear. For example, the opening mentions modern technology’s positive effects, while the next paragraph shifts to the claim that research should “solely focus” on improvement without fully connecting the two. The long personal anecdote also takes up substantial space before its relevance is summarised. Use clearer topic sentences and link each example directly to the claim it supports; vary transitions and make references such as “Those” more precise.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary to discuss science and its effects, including “misuse of technology,” “paradigm shift,” “higher studies,” and “endless possibilities.” These choices help communicate your position, and the meaning is generally clear. Some expressions, however, are imprecise or do not collocate naturally, such as “changed our lives alot in different manners,” “the science should excel more towards technologies,” and “a devoter of science.” There are also spelling and form issues, including “alot” and “soo.” Aim for more precise academic phrasing and check common word partnerships. For instance, describe science as “advancing research into technologies” rather than “excel[ling] towards technologies,” and use “supporter of science” instead of “devoter of science.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses beginning “It is a general perception that…” and “when I saw one of my neighbour crying.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, but some errors in agreement, articles, verb forms, and punctuation remain. Examples include “topic … have a deep effect,” “Those … has caused,” and “a individuals daily life”; these should be revised for subject–verb agreement and article or possessive use. Several sentences also run together because spaces after full stops and commas are missing, and the anecdote contains a long sentence that would be clearer if divided. Review agreement and sentence boundaries, while continuing to use complex structures with careful proofreading.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.