Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Science plays a significant role towards human's lives. Although scientific research has several objectives, i strongly believe that its primary objective should be to improve people's quality of life.

One of the main reason why science should have to focus on improving the human lives is its contribution in medical advancement. In addition, the development of important vaccines for example, cancer and diabities can play a vital role in improving the healthcare facilities. Furthermore, due to the improvements of healthcare facilities, it may increase the life expectancy of the people. So, it will increase the value of human development index which is a good measure of development of a country.

Furthermore, scientific innovations have also improved the human lives in many fields for example, in agricultural and industrial sectors etc. By introducing the new technology in agricultural sector, it not only makes easy the human work but also increases the productivity of that sector which leads to increase the quantity of raw material for industrial sector. When there will be more quantity of raw material, industrial sector will altimately develop. As a result, there will be more goods and services in the country and it may rasie the value of total GDP (Gross Domestic Product) which is also an important indicator of humand development index.

In conclusion, i strongly believe that to improve the human lives should be the primary objective of science, as medical discoveries and innovations can play a crucial role towards standard of the living. In addition, these developments improve the healthcare facilities and also increase the productivity in both major sectors of the economy like agricultural and industrial sectors.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you strongly agree that science should primarily improve people’s lives, and the conclusion restates this view. You support it with relevant areas—medical research and advances in agriculture and industry—and explain possible benefits such as longer life expectancy, greater productivity, and economic growth. This addresses the task, but some points are not fully or accurately developed. For example, describing vaccines for “cancer and diabities” needs clarification and a reliable example, while the link from GDP to the Human Development Index is asserted rather than explained. To strengthen the response, develop fewer examples in more depth and show directly how each improves people’s lives, rather than relying mainly on national indicators.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting supporting reasons, and a conclusion. The ideas generally progress from healthcare to economic and agricultural benefits, and signposting such as “Furthermore,” “As a result,” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the argument. However, the linking is sometimes mechanical, with “Furthermore” repeated, and some connections are not sufficiently clear. In the second body paragraph, the chain from agricultural technology to raw materials, industrial development, GDP, and human development becomes difficult to follow because several steps are compressed into long sentences. Use a wider range of linking methods, make cause-and-effect relationships explicit, and ensure each paragraph develops one central point in a more controlled sequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “medical advancement,” “life expectancy,” “productivity,” and “Gross Domestic Product.” These terms help communicate the main ideas, and the meaning is generally clear despite some inaccurate choices. Several collocations and word forms are awkward, however: “role towards human’s lives,” “improvements of healthcare facilities,” and “increase the value of human development index” do not sound natural in context. There are also spelling errors, including “diabities,” “altimately,” “rasie,” and “humand.” Aim for more precise, natural combinations and proofread spelling. For instance, use “improve people’s quality of life” and “raise the Human Development Index” where appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a concessive opening (“Although scientific research has several objectives…”) and cause-and-effect structures. Most of the argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make relationships less clear. Examples include “One of the main reason” (singular/plural agreement), “it not only makes easy the human work” (sentence structure), and “When there will be more quantity of raw material” (conditional construction). Articles and possessives also need attention in phrases such as “the human lives” and “the standard of the living.” Practise building accurate complex sentences, especially conditionals and parallel “not only…but also” structures, and check agreement and article use during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.