Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Science play major role in technological advancement and its main goal to improve people's lives. In my opinion, I completely agree with that science has significant impact on people lives because it has changed the way of living life by reducing stress and pressure.

On the one hand, one of the major advantage of science evolution, it is making ease in life by alleviating the efforts and pressure to live healthier life. For example, Indian railways recently launched an IRCTC application to make tickets effortlessly prior to that, was challenging to stand in long queue behind the railway station counters. This step taken by Indian railway using science technology to make people life convenient and easier.

On the other hand, automation in industries using science model reduced time, efforts and cost because

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

Your position is clear: you completely agree that science should improve people’s lives, and the railway-ticket application is a relevant example of making a service more convenient. However, the response addresses the task only partially. The first reason is briefly explained, while the second paragraph begins a point about industrial automation but ends at “because,” so the idea and its supporting example are missing. There is also no developed conclusion to reinforce your view. The response is substantially below the required minimum length, which limits how fully you can explain your reasons. To strengthen the answer, develop at least two distinct reasons, explain how each improves people’s lives, and support them with specific examples before concluding clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has a basic paragraph structure, and “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” signal an attempt to organise contrasting points. The overall progression is nevertheless incomplete: the second body paragraph stops mid-sentence, leaving the reader without the promised explanation, and there is no concluding paragraph. Some links between ideas are also unclear; for example, the opening moves from science’s role in technological advancement to its effect on stress and pressure without explaining the connection. Use a clear sequence—position, developed reason, example, second developed reason, conclusion—and connect each example explicitly to the claim it supports. This would make the organisation more coherent and the linking less dependent on formulaic signposts.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “technological advancement,” “alleviating,” “automation,” and “convenient,” which helps communicate the general subject. There is also an attempt to use less common language, although several choices are inaccurate or unnatural: “science evolution,” “science model,” and “making ease in life” do not express the intended ideas idiomatically. Repetition of “life” and “efforts” also limits the range. Aim for precise collocations such as “scientific progress,” “automation in industry,” and “reduce the burden of everyday tasks.” The meaning is generally recoverable, but more accurate word combinations and a broader set of terms for benefits would make the vocabulary more effective.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a sentence beginning “because” and the example introduced by “For example.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to affect clarity. For instance, “Science play” needs subject–verb agreement, while “its main goal to improve” is missing a verb. In “one of the major advantage … it is making,” the plural form and sentence structure are faulty. The railway example also contains an incomplete clause: “prior to that, was challenging.” The final sentence is unfinished after “because.” Practise complete sentence patterns, agreement, articles, and clause boundaries, then proofread each sentence to ensure it has a clear subject and finite verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.