Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often argued that the main goal of the sceince should be to enhance individual's lives. I completely agree with this perspective because I believe that science help people in many ways. In this essay, I will discuss my veiw in the subsequent paragraphs.

One of the main benefits of advance technology is global communication. To elaborate, if our relative live in one nation and we in another, modern instruments will help us to communicate with them. For instance, Whatsapp and Massenger these applications assists us to make connections. Furthermore, fast transport with the help of which we can cover the distance of months in hours. To exemplify, Airplanes and Bullet trains these vehicales reach the speed of four Hundred Kilometre per hour.

Secondly, it also beneficial in our daily life. What I mean by this is that in our house their are numerous accessories that are examples technology such as regerator, oven and washing machines. Moreover, with the advancment in science our learning also increases. A prime example of this is Icloud and Chatgpt these AI tools can give us answer of any question.

Thirdly, it assists us to entertain ourself. To be more precise, TV programs and podcasts that give us a chance to spend quality time with our siblings.

In conclusion, although there many aims of the science however ever I contend that main of these should be make to the life of the citizen easy. By giving us global communication, Knowledge and entertainment.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you completely agree that science should improve people’s lives, and you give relevant examples involving communication, transport, household appliances, learning and entertainment. However, the response addresses the task only partially because these points are mostly listed rather than explained in depth. For example, you mention that messaging apps help relatives communicate, but do not explain the broader impact on people’s lives or consider any limits to this benefit. The conclusion restates your view but does not add a developed final insight. The response also falls two words short of the required 250-word minimum. To strengthen the answer, develop fewer examples with clearer explanations of how they improve well-being, and ensure the response meets the stated length.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, three body paragraphs and a conclusion. Sequencing phrases such as “One of the main benefits,” “Secondly” and “Thirdly” help readers follow the main points. However, progression is limited because the body paragraphs often present examples without connecting them through explanation, and the repeated signposting makes the organisation feel mechanical. Some references are also unclear: “these applications” follows two app names, while “these AI tools” refers to Icloud and Chatgpt without explaining their distinct roles. The final sentence is a fragment beginning “By giving us…”, which weakens the conclusion’s connection to the preceding claim. Build each paragraph around one central idea, explain its significance, and use linking and referencing more precisely.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “global communication,” “modern instruments,” “advancement in science” and “quality time.” These choices make your main examples understandable. However, the range is limited and several spelling, word-form and collocation errors are noticeable, sometimes making the reader pause. Examples include “sceince,” “veiw,” “regerator” and “advancment”; “fast transport” and “make connections” are also less precise in context. Some expressions, such as “numerous accessories” for household appliances, do not convey the intended meaning naturally. Aim to learn accurate forms and common collocations, and choose vocabulary that describes the benefit precisely—for example, explain how technology enables people to stay in contact or reduces travel time.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt some longer structures, including the conditional sentence beginning “if our relative live in one nation” and the explanation introduced by “What I mean by this is that…”. However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently in basic sentence patterns, agreement, articles and sentence boundaries. For example, “science help people” needs subject–verb agreement, while “in our house their are” has an incorrect verb form and construction. “For instance, Whatsapp and Massenger these applications assists us” combines sentence elements awkwardly and has an agreement error. The conclusion also contains an incomplete sentence: “By giving us global communication, Knowledge and entertainment.” Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then connect them with controlled subordinate clauses; check agreement, articles and whether each sentence has a complete main clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.