Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The main purpose of science should be to improve people's lives. I completely agree that the main goal of science shouild be to improve the individual's life. Scientist are working hard to solve the problem of science and government is investing a lot moneny on research projects. Consiquently, the main purpose of science should be to improve people' lives in terms of reducing their work load, and making their tasks more easier.

Scientists are working hard to find out the research gaps and solving these problems. On the other side, the government is investing a lot of money on research project for development of new technology. For example, Government gives a lot of funds to research institutes for cancer research and dicovey of its medicine.Scientist are working hard day and night to solving the complexities.

Upon these basis, science main goal should be to improve people's lives better. Science should invent technology, which can make people work more easier. It discover the tools which can complete their work more effectivey. For example, invention of bullet trains can reduce their time of transportation, which can be invested on other useful tasks.

In conclusion, scientists and goverment are investing a lot of their efforts. So the main goal of science should be to make people's work easier . i completely agree with this statement .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

Your position is clear: you completely agree that science should improve people’s lives, and you give relevant examples involving cancer research and bullet trains. However, the response addresses the task only partially because the reasons are repeated rather than developed. For instance, you say science should reduce workloads and make tasks easier, but do not explain in detail how scientific advances achieve this or consider whether improving lives should be science’s most important aim compared with other goals. The examples are relevant but brief, and the cancer example is not connected clearly to the claim about making work easier. The response is also 27 words below the required minimum. Develop two distinct reasons, explain their benefits, and add specific supporting detail.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, supporting paragraphs and a conclusion, and the examples generally relate to the main position. However, progression is limited because the same point—that science should make people’s work easier—is repeated in several paragraphs. Some links are mechanical or unclear: “On the other side” does not establish a clear contrast, while “Upon these basis” is an awkward transition into the next claim. The conclusion largely repeats the introduction rather than drawing together developed reasons. Improve the progression by giving each body paragraph one distinct reason, then use clear links to show how its example supports that reason. Check that references such as “these problems” have an unmistakable antecedent.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “research,” “technology,” “cancer research,” and “transportation,” so the reader can follow the general subject. However, the range is limited and several phrases are repetitive or imprecise, particularly repeated references to making work “easier.” There are also noticeable spelling and word-form errors, such as “shouild,” “moneny,” “Consiquently,” “dicovey,” and “effectivey,” which reduce accuracy and can distract the reader. Some collocations are unnatural, including “solve the problem of science” and “make their tasks more easier.” Build a wider set of precise expressions for scientific aims and outcomes, and proofread spelling and collocations carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, and the overall meaning is usually understandable. However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently in sentence construction, agreement, verb forms and punctuation. Examples include “Scientist are working” and “government is investing,” where number and article use need attention, and “day and night to solving,” where the verb pattern is incorrect. “It discover the tools” also has an unclear subject and incorrect agreement. The sentence beginning “For example, Government gives…” needs more accurate article and tense choices, and several sentences run together or have inconsistent capitalisation. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and verb patterns, then use a wider range of controlled complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.