Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Education is universally recognised as the foundation of personal success and national development. Many individuals argue that the most crucial aim of science should be to enhance people's lives. I completely agree with this view.

To commence with, there are several compelling reason behind it. First and foremost, science provides better life expentency to pupils and individuals. Nowadays, many residents survive a plenty type of disease in their life, which effects on their well-being. If science techonolgy improve, so it will enhance people's health. For instance, many medicines and vaccination will get by science. If scientist give more concentration our surrounding area, they will to treat any type disease with the help of medicine and injection. So, it also enhance well-being.

Another reason is that many residents depend only science. Because science provides more knowledge of their health and ecosystem. It is related to humanbeings, animals, plants and other biological, which also grant better life survival for them. For example, science subject provide more information about anyone life, which gives them a better opportunity for surviving. Subsequently, science provides understanding level of modern weapons. Scientist use this techonology for protecting to wars.

In conclusion, although I believe science play a significant role in human lives such as provides more knowlegde, makes medicines and weapons. Science is more paramount for enhancing citizens life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: “I completely agree,” and the response gives relevant reasons, especially science’s contribution to health and knowledge of the ecosystem. However, the task is only partially addressed because these ideas are asserted rather than explained or supported in detail. The examples of medicines and vaccines are relevant, but the discussion does not show specifically how scientific advances improve people’s lives. The point about weapons is also insufficiently connected to the stated aim and could complicate your position. The response is 28 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop your reasons. Extend each main idea with a specific example and explain its benefit to people.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Sequencing phrases such as “First and foremost,” “Another reason,” and “In conclusion” help signal the stages of your argument. However, progression within the body paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow: the discussion moves from health to the surrounding area, then to ecosystem knowledge and weapons without clearly showing how each point connects to the main claim. Some linking is mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “So” and “For example.” Improve cohesion by organising each paragraph around one central reason, then developing it with an explanation and a directly relevant example. Clearer references between sentences would also help readers follow your reasoning.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “well-being,” “ecosystem,” “vaccination,” and “modern weapons,” and the meaning is generally recoverable. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices or collocations make parts of the response difficult to understand. For example, “survive a plenty type of disease” and “science provides better life expentency” do not express the intended ideas naturally. There are also noticeable spelling errors, such as “techonolgy,” “knowlegde,” and “expentency.” Aim to learn vocabulary in accurate phrases, such as “increase life expectancy” and “develop effective treatments,” and check spelling carefully. More precise wording would make your examples clearer and your argument more convincing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and conditional structures, as in “If science techonolgy improve, so it will enhance people's health.” This shows an effort to express cause and effect, but the conditional is not controlled, and errors occur frequently across the response. Examples include “there are several compelling reason,” “many medicines and vaccination will get by science,” and “Science is more paramount for enhancing citizens life.” These sentences contain problems with agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction that can make the intended meaning unclear. Build accuracy first with complete, direct sentences, then practise combining them using correctly formed clauses. Check subject–verb agreement and plural forms when editing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.