Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In this contermporary era, the issue of why people should learn science is a topic of significance debate. While others are learning science to develop their own interests, some sectors of the society believe that science should upgrade human life. I strongly agree that people should learn science to improve their envoronment since many positives are being experienced due to the changes in science.

One of the main reasons why this argument is valid is the improvement taking place in the health sector due to science. These days, compilcated machines have been introduced to detect diseases and also to give data on the internal organs of a human body. Chemotherapy and Physiotherapy are now being used to help cancer patience. In Zimbabwe, a few years back, many people were dying because of the HIV virus. Due to science ARVs have been introduced, which are helping patience to survive longer with the virus. Therefore more improvements are expected in the health sector if people continue learning science.

The other issue is the improvement in technology, especially the motor and communication industries. There have been greater improvements in those departments which are of great benefit to the people. Cars initially used gears, but they moved to automatic and now they can be operated without a driver.Telephones have been improved to smartphones. These days a phone can be used to make calls, for banking, as a map, to watch movies, and many other applications. All these are being made possible because of science.

In conclusion, science is contributing in the improvent of people's lives. Therefore, I strongly agree that the main aim of science must be to make human life better.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction to the conclusion: you strongly agree that science should make human life better. The health and technology paragraphs provide relevant support, including ARVs in Zimbabwe, medical equipment, smartphones and driverless cars. This gives the response a solid, task-focused argument. However, the discussion sometimes shifts from the aim of science to why people should learn science, and the examples are mostly listed rather than explained in depth. For instance, you could clarify how the medical advances illustrate science’s central purpose, or acknowledge that scientific research may also pursue knowledge before producing practical benefits. The response addresses the task, but developing these links and balancing the ideas more fully would strengthen it.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs organised around health and technology, and a conclusion that restates your view. Topic sentences such as “One of the main reasons” and “The other issue” help readers follow the progression, while “Therefore” signals a result. The organisation is coherent, though some connections feel mechanical and the examples within each paragraph are mainly placed in a list. The transition from the task’s question about science’s most important aim to “why people should learn science” also weakens the line of argument. Make links between each example and your central claim more explicit, and use a wider range of natural transitions and referencing to create smoother progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your main points, including “health sector,” “internal organs,” “Chemotherapy,” “automatic,” and “smartphones.” These terms help make the examples relevant and specific. However, several spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural expressions reduce accuracy, such as “contermporary,” “envoronment,” “compilcated,” “patience” where you mean people receiving treatment, and “improvent.” Phrases such as “significance debate” and “upgrade human life” are also not natural collocations in this context. The range is adequate, but greater control of spelling, word forms and collocation is needed for more precise expression. Proofread carefully and choose phrases that describe scientific progress and its effects naturally.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a subordinate clause in “While others are learning science…” and a relative clause in “which are helping patience to survive longer.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, and the paragraph structure gives you opportunities to develop more varied syntax. Some grammatical and punctuation errors remain. For example, “a topic of significance debate” has an incorrect noun construction, and “a phone can be used to make calls, for banking” has an awkward parallel structure. There is also a missing space after the full stop in “driver.Telephones,” and the comma after “Therefore” is omitted. Review noun phrases, parallel lists and sentence punctuation, while continuing to use complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.