Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The most crucial aim of science should be to enhance individuals lives. Mostly people believe that science plays a important role in human lives. I am alignes with this view that science changes our lives in medical and technological ways.

To begin with, growning number of population assume that science helps to develop medicines and medical treatment. It is largely because these days technology is getti ng advance and it help the doctors to deteact the disease and treat it it very well. Meanwhile, many researchers are doing enhancement in medical development and they optimise the treatment planning which save indivividuals from damage. For instance, new scientific advancement help the doctors to minimize the radiation therapy treatment planning in cancer. Moreover this development target the tumor cells and save healthy organs from radiation therapy.

Furthermore, A wide rangle of people argue that these days techhnology is getting advance and it helps in acadamic career. A key factor is that these days, students use internet rapidly to understand their lessons and technology helps to learn new skills easily. Also, people use artificial intelligents in their regular basis and technology are more facster then human and it work very fastly. For example, nowadays, internet helps the students to connect with educational resources and help them to communicate with teachers at any place.

Overall, science is very essential in people life because it make life more convient. Personally, i assume science supports in education and medical development,

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You present a relevant position: you agree that science improves lives, focusing on medical care and education. The cancer-treatment example gives the first point some specific support, and the educational-resource example is also relevant. However, the response does not fully develop either argument: the medical paragraph repeats that technology helps doctors without explaining the wider benefit, while the education paragraph makes broad claims about internet use and artificial intelligence. Your conclusion restates your view but adds little. The response is also six words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to explain and support your ideas. Develop each main point with a clearer explanation and a specific example, and make your degree of agreement explicit throughout.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs introduced by “To begin with” and “Furthermore,” and a concluding statement. The medical and education ideas are grouped into separate paragraphs, so the reader can follow the main direction. However, progression within the paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, and several sentences repeat the general claim that technology is advancing or helpful. Connections between claims and examples could be clearer; for instance, the cancer-treatment example needs a sentence explaining how the stated benefit improves patients’ lives. The final paragraph is brief and ends with a comma, making the ending feel incomplete. Use clearer links between each claim, explanation, and example, and finish with a complete concluding sentence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “medical treatment,” “radiation therapy,” “tumor cells,” “educational resources,” and “artificial intelligence.” These choices show an attempt to discuss science in specific contexts. However, the range is limited by repeated general words such as “technology,” “helps,” and “development,” and several inaccurate or misspelled expressions make the meaning less natural. Examples include “a important role,” “growing number of population,” “getting advance,” and “more facster.” Some phrases, such as “use artificial intelligence in their regular basis,” are difficult to interpret because the collocation is incorrect. Build a more precise range of verbs and topic-specific phrases, and check spelling and collocations carefully before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including explanations introduced by “because” and examples introduced by “For instance.” This gives the response some structural variety. However, errors occur frequently in sentence construction, verb forms, agreement, and articles, and they sometimes make the reader pause. For example, “science plays a important role” has an article error, “technology is getting advance” uses an incorrect verb pattern, and “technology are more faster” has agreement and comparative-form problems. The final sentence, “Personally, i assume science supports in education and medical development,” is also incomplete in punctuation and phrasing. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and verb patterns, and proofread each sentence for a complete, correctly punctuated structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.