Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Science as a subject should be concentrated to improving quality of people's lives. I completely agree with this statement. However, precautions should also be present there while applying science and technology in different fields of our life.

Science, a field of learning, mainly deals with various principles underlying different causes and effects of various happenings surrounding us. It works for innovations and advancements of different technology which help to ease our day to day life. Science support us in various ways e.g. from going to the moon to performing our chores. With the discovery and innovation of different devices and gadgets, we can perform our daily activities, which were once difficult or laborous, effortlessly and rapidly. For example, it was very difficult for us to move from one place to another when there was no wheel. But after inventing wheel, people started to use wheeled vehicles to make the transportation easier and more comfortable. Similarly, when there was no land phones we had to wait weeks after weeks, even months, to communicate with our relatives or known persons. But now, with the support of mobile and internet, we can contact with our relatives or known persons within seconds, as many times as we desire, and also watching them live on video calls.

However, there are also bad impacts of these technological innovations and advancements. Due to the usage of different electronic gadgets such as air conditioners, refridgerators, mobile phones, etc., the greenhouse gases are increasing rapidly in the atmorphere. Consequently, degrading the environmental quality by causing global warming and relevant consequences. The excessive use of mobile phones and internet are having negative impacts on the health and psychology of our young generations.

Therefore, it should be concluded that science should focus mainly on improving our quality of lives but also should take care of the adverse impacts of its applications on our lives, health, environment, and society.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction—“I completely agree”—and remains consistent in the conclusion. You address the central issue by explaining how science improves daily life, using examples of transport and communication, then acknowledging environmental and health costs. These examples are relevant and give the response a clear line of argument. To strengthen the development further, explain more explicitly why improving people’s lives should be science’s most important aim, rather than simply describing useful inventions. The discussion of harmful effects is also comparatively brief: for instance, you mention impacts on young people’s health and psychology but do not explain or illustrate them. More analysis linking each example to your position would make the ideas more fully developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, the body paragraphs present benefits and drawbacks, and the conclusion restates your position with a qualification. The progression from transport to communication, followed by the discussion of risks, is easy to follow. You also use signposting such as “However,” “Similarly,” and “Therefore” to show relationships between ideas. At times, though, the linking feels formulaic, and some connections within sentences are not smooth. The sentence beginning “Consequently, degrading the environmental quality” is a fragment, which interrupts the flow from the preceding point. Aim to connect cause and consequence in complete sentences and use referencing or transitions that clarify how each example supports your argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “innovations,” “technological advancements,” “greenhouse gases,” and “global warming,” and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “underlying different causes and effects.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, including “concentrated to improving,” “ease our day to day life,” and “contact with our relatives.” Some expressions are also repetitive, particularly “different” and “various,” while “known persons” sounds unnatural in this context. Spelling slips such as “laborous,” “refridgerators,” and “atmorphere” further limit precision. Choose more natural collocations and check spelling carefully to make your vocabulary more fluent and exact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “when,” “which,” and “while,” and most of the argument remains understandable. Some sentences are controlled well, such as the example about wheeled vehicles making transportation easier. However, there are some errors in sentence structure, agreement, and grammatical patterns. “Science support us” needs subject–verb agreement, while “The excessive use … are having” has a singular subject with a plural verb. “Consequently, degrading…” is not a complete sentence, and “we can contact with” uses an incorrect verb pattern. The opening phrase “should be concentrated to improving” also has an inaccurate grammatical construction. Review agreement and verb patterns, and ensure that each sentence has a complete main clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.