Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In current times, the world is witnessing remarkable development in the field of science. Many individuals believe that the principle aim of science is to be the improvement in the lives of people. I totally agree with this statement.

To begin with the fact, that all the advancement in science should be focused in the people's development. As people are the fundamental driving force of running the whole world, ease of people's life should be the primary objective. As a result of individual's life improvement, the productivity of people also increases. For instance, providing the best technology and environment to the pupil leads to increase in concentration and engagement of a child in his or her studies.

Moreover, scientific advancement creates more opportunities in the field of science. Eventually, there will be a boost in the global economy. Many countries currently are trying their best in developing the research centers for technological advancements. Subsequently, more number of scientists are required to run the centers and participate in more and more discoveries. For example, from 2020 after the world has witnessed COVID 19, many research laboratories are trying to invent vaccines which may protect humankind from future threats. As a result, thousands of people get employment in such laboratories, which in turn increased the global GDP.

In conclusion, the main aim of science should be focusing on improvement in human's life, which leads to increase in productivity and employability of people. Subsequently, there will be an increase in the global economy.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you totally agree that science should aim to improve people’s lives, and the conclusion returns to this view. The response gives relevant reasons, including improved productivity and employment, and the examples of education technology and vaccine research help illustrate them. However, the first example is only loosely connected to scientific research, and the link between creating research jobs and improving people’s lives is not fully explained. The discussion also focuses mainly on economic benefits, leaving other direct effects of science on wellbeing less explored. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation of how it supports your position, and consider acknowledging that science may also pursue knowledge whose benefits are not immediate.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally stay focused, and signposting such as “Moreover,” “For instance,” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the argument. However, some links feel mechanical or do not show the precise relationship between ideas. For example, “As a result of individual's life improvement” is followed by a productivity claim without clearly explaining the causal steps, while “Subsequently” is repeated to introduce outcomes. The opening phrase “To begin with the fact, that” also interrupts the flow. Use more natural transitions and make the reasoning within each paragraph progress step by step, with clear references to what each pronoun or outcome refers.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “scientific advancement,” “research centers,” “vaccines,” “humankind,” and “global economy.” These choices make the subject clear, and you attempt some less common expressions. At times, however, word choice and collocation are inaccurate or unnatural: “principle aim” should be “principal aim,” “focused in the people's development” is not idiomatic, and “more number of scientists” is awkward. “Invent vaccines” would be more naturally expressed as “develop vaccines.” These issues do not prevent understanding, but they reduce precision and fluency. Build accuracy by learning common word partnerships and checking whether a phrase sounds natural in context, rather than relying on direct translations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including cause-and-effect structures with “As a result” and a relative clause in “which may protect humankind from future threats.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “To begin with the fact, that” has incorrect sentence construction and punctuation; “ease of people's life should be” needs a more accurate noun phrase and agreement; and “leads to increase” is missing “an” before “increase.” In “which in turn increased the global GDP,” the tense does not fit the surrounding general claim. Work on articles, singular/plural agreement, verb forms, and sentence boundaries. More consistently accurate complex sentences would make your reasoning easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.