Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Science and technology has drastically changed the entire world where the most important aim is to improve people's lives. I completely agree with this statement because without science the development of people and the country is impossible.

Firstly, inventions of science makes people life much easier and advanced. For example, telephones which is also one of the invention of science makes people connected. They can talk to anyone from any part of the world where they don't have to wait for long. People can connect to each other and share their feelings. Also, the establishment of big industries and factories has provided people with so many opportunities. It helps to reduce unemployment problem in the country contributing to the nation's economy. For example, a clothing factory hires number of people with jobs which will help in fulfilling their needs.

Secondly, people nowaday's are completely depend upon technologies and development which has helped in different ways. It saves time and makes easier. For example, the advancement in transport system cannot be overlooked. People used to travel longer distance even to get hospital losing their life. But now, the development of scince has made distance closer with modern vehicles and road. Furthermore, today's children are more creative with the use of technology. They could get anything they wanted to. It has saved people time and energy.

In conclusion, the development in science has positive effects in people's lives. It binds people, makes people feel connected and developed the sense of feeling of belonging.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the opening: you completely agree that science should improve people’s lives. You support this with relevant examples involving communication, employment, transport and access to hospitals, so the response addresses the task and gives the reader reasons for your view. However, some points are more fully explained than others. The telephone example shows how people connect, while the claim that factories reduce unemployment is not developed beyond a brief illustration. The point about children becoming more creative is also asserted rather than explained, and the conclusion mainly repeats benefits instead of drawing the argument together. To strengthen the response, explain more precisely how each example demonstrates science improving people’s lives and develop the less-supported ideas.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, two body paragraphs signalled by “Firstly” and “Secondly,” and a conclusion. The examples generally follow the claims they are intended to support, which makes the main line of argument understandable. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, with several ideas joined by “Also,” “For example,” and “Furthermore” rather than linked through their meaning. Some references are unclear, such as “It saves time and makes easier,” where the reader has to infer what “It” refers to and what is made easier. The conclusion also introduces “a sense of belonging” without establishing that idea in the body. Use clearer references and connect each example explicitly to the point it supports.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your main ideas, including “inventions,” “unemployment,” “transport system,” and “advancement.” Some phrases also show an attempt to express broader effects, such as “contributing to the nation’s economy.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations sound unnatural or imprecise: “people life,” “development of people,” “makes distance closer,” and “sense of feeling of belonging.” There are also spelling and form errors, including “scince” and “nowaday’s,” which reduce accuracy. Aim for more precise, natural combinations and avoid repeating general terms such as “development” and “people.” For example, describe specific improvements in communication, employment or mobility rather than relying on broad claims.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “because,” “which,” and “where,” and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, errors occur across several sentence patterns. Subject–verb agreement is inaccurate in “Science and technology has” and “inventions of science makes”; articles and plurals are also problematic in “a clothing factory hires number of people.” Some clauses are incomplete or awkwardly formed, as in “It saves time and makes easier,” while “People used to travel longer distance even to get hospital losing their life” combines several ideas without clear grammatical relationships. Practise agreement, articles, and complete clause construction, then check each sentence for a clear subject and verb. More accurate control of these patterns would make your examples easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.