Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some people believe that aim of science should be to improve the overall well being of human beings and what matters to their everyday lives. I partly agree with this opinion because even though science can play a crucial part in improving people's lives but science as a subject is a very vast study and there are other aspects where science can be useful such as: environment well being, useful for other biological beings and even the outcourse of entire universe.

Admittedly, a major aspect of science can be dedicated to the study of human welfare and overall improvement in quality of life for humans. As science can help us evolve better and understand the core of human consciousness and different nature of human beings. For instance, a recent study figured out that there is a female organ which was stated as something irrelevant in the 90s when they could not figure out the actual use value for it. Recently the organ was rediscovered and researchers found out that it has a major part to play in hormonal fluctuation in an woman's body. So this brings us to a concrete point that science can be extremely beneficial when put to correct use value for human beings.

However, the main aim of science should not revolve around human welfare. One main reason being that is, humans constantly evolve when the surroundings around them also tend to change. Science plays a very significant part in our lives and contributes to aspects such as environment, artificial intelligence, universe, physics which are subjects that require constant research and exploration as well. For example, Humans dedicated some part of the science to AI which is also known as artificial intelligence which plays a very significant role in our lives. In the current times, it also helps us to understabd complex concepts in the easiest way possible.

In conclusion, The overall field of science deals with a lot more than just human welfare and the study of science should be expanded to different aspects along with enhancing the livelihood of human beings.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you partly agree that science should improve human lives, while arguing that it also has wider purposes. Both sides are addressed, and the examples about medical research and artificial intelligence are relevant. The medical example helps explain how research can improve understanding of human health, although the organ and its significance are described vaguely, so the support is not fully convincing. The AI example is also asserted rather than developed: explain more specifically how it benefits society or why its study matters beyond immediate human welfare. Your conclusion restates the central view, but could more directly clarify how you weigh improving people’s lives against other scientific aims. More precise, fully explained examples would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs presenting the human-welfare argument and the broader purposes of science, and a conclusion. Linking expressions such as “Admittedly,” “However,” and “In conclusion” help signal the direction of the argument. Some connections are less clear or feel mechanical, however. For example, “So this brings us to a concrete point” does not clearly explain how the preceding example proves the claim, and the transition from changing surroundings to AI research is abrupt. There is also some repetition of “science” and “human welfare.” To improve progression, make each paragraph’s main point explicit, connect examples directly to that point, and use clearer referencing so readers can follow how each idea supports your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “human consciousness,” “hormonal fluctuation,” “artificial intelligence,” and “research and exploration.” These choices show an attempt to discuss scientific ideas beyond basic terms, and the meaning is generally understandable. However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, such as “overall well being,” “use value,” “outcourse of entire universe,” and “understandb complex concepts” (the latter also contains a spelling error). “Useful for other biological beings” is vague, while “plays a very significant role” is repeated. Aim for more precise academic phrasing and check spelling and collocations. For instance, describe science as contributing to environmental protection or expanding knowledge of the universe, rather than using unclear expressions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including subordinate clauses beginning “even though” and “when,” and most of your meaning remains clear. Some grammatical errors occur, particularly with articles, agreement, and sentence construction. In the opening, “I partly agree … because even though … but” combines two contrasting structures incorrectly; use either “although” or “because” without the extra “but.” In “an woman's body,” the article and possessive form are not correctly combined, and “a major aspect … can be dedicated” has an unclear grammatical relationship between the subject and action. Capitalisation is also inconsistent, as in “Humans” and “The” after commas or at the start of the conclusion. Review sentence boundaries and article use, while continuing to vary sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.