Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-07-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is widely believed that the one of the most crucial aim of researchers should be enhance individual's lives. However, science performs major roll in humans life and it will increase over the years. I strongly agree with this statement. I will elaborate my point of views in the following paragraphs.

In today's modern era, the innovation are becoming increasingly popular throughout the world. However, various items have been replaced to former items. moreover, it is beneficial things for citizens. If we talk about education so there should be improvement because small kids are facing several issues in they day-to day life in Learning Centre and they get lower score in they school journey, so there must be robot teacher not only intelligent but also hard-worker. Either orally or in writing, they should be helpful. Secondly, in corporate companies work burden has escalated and and employees do not have adequate time for other activities so science should innovation new technology to mitigate their work load. For instance, during festivals, teenagers face various homework-related issues, so technology should help them.

By contrast, experts should have consider country welfare because it Contributes to individuals in every aspects of daily lifes. Not only citizens life but also country peace is crucial and they should improve weapons and others facilities apart from individuals health.

In summary, both points performs very adequate role and it helps not only individuals but also country welfare. However, situation should be manage from both sides it is very essential things.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position, but the development of ideas is inconsistent. While you mention education and corporate workload as areas for scientific improvement, the arguments are somewhat superficial and lack specific, logical examples. For instance, the suggestion of 'robot teachers' is a creative idea, but it is not clearly linked to the broader aim of improving lives. The third paragraph introduces a conflicting point about national welfare, which creates some confusion regarding your overall stance. To improve, ensure each paragraph focuses on a single, well-supported argument that directly relates to the prompt's core question about the purpose of science.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as the repetitive use of 'However' and 'moreover'. Some transitions are abrupt, and the logical progression between sentences is occasionally hindered by unclear referencing (e.g., 'various items have been replaced to former items'). To reach a higher band, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and ensure that each sentence flows naturally into the next, rather than relying on simple connectors at the start of every sentence.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary range is limited and often imprecise. There are several instances of awkward collocations and word choice errors, such as 'science performs major roll' (role) and 'science should innovation new technology' (innovate). Some phrases are repetitive, and the use of 'beneficial things' is too vague for an academic essay. To improve, try to use more precise terminology related to the topic, such as 'technological advancement', 'societal well-being', or 'mitigate professional challenges'. Expanding your vocabulary to include more academic collocations will significantly enhance the quality of your writing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('the innovation are', 'both points performs'), incorrect pluralization ('individual's lives', 'daily lifes'), and missing articles. Sentence structures are mostly simple, and attempts at complex sentences often contain errors in punctuation or word order. To improve, pay closer attention to basic subject-verb agreement and the correct use of articles. Practicing the construction of complex sentences—using relative clauses or conditional structures—will help you demonstrate a wider range of grammatical control.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.