Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-07-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Science is struggling to facilitate the way of people living by inventing more advance technology , I largely agree with the purpose of scientist in development of world , in forthcoming paragraph i will discuss my perspective regarding positive aspects of science research .

The most compelling reason to prioritize improving people lives is that science has ability to sort-out complicated problems that the individual face in this era , For example discoveries of various categories of vaccinations , antibiotics , advance treatments , through science it is possible to diagnose and treat some fetal diseases like cancer , it is impossible to handle pandemic and epidemic diseases without research in medical field of science .

Moreover agriculture science has developed some advance methods in irrigation that facilitate the wastage of excess water , through agriculture science it is likely the produce the disease resistant crops with high quality and quantity yield .

Majorly discoveries in different fields of science like physics , biology and mathematics make our life more feasible, with the development in technology the information's are just single click away from us , we get access to the knowledge and information at any time and at any place even in the space .

There are some negative aspects of science are also available, science unexpectedly change our life , you can do any thing without any physical involvement leads various health issues like obesity , hypertension ETC.

In conclusion science deliver direct benefit to our life , this make our life so easy and its proves to beneficial to control the death rate all over the world .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses the prompt by expressing a clear position in favor of science improving lives. The ideas are relevant, covering medical, agricultural, and technological advancements. However, the development is somewhat superficial. For instance, the mention of 'physics, biology and mathematics' is a list rather than a developed argument. The counter-argument regarding negative aspects is introduced but lacks depth, as it is not fully integrated into the overall position. To reach a higher band, you should expand on your examples with more specific evidence or logical reasoning rather than listing general benefits.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the progression of ideas. You use some cohesive devices like 'Moreover' and 'In conclusion' to link sections. However, the use of these devices is sometimes mechanical or slightly inaccurate, such as the transition between the introduction and the first body paragraph. Additionally, some sentences are run-on or lack clear logical connectors, making the flow feel a bit disjointed. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence would enhance the overall coherence.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'vaccinations', 'antibiotics', and 'irrigation'. However, there are several instances of word-choice errors and awkward collocations, such as 'facilitate the way of people living' instead of 'improve the quality of life', and 'produce the disease resistant crops' instead of 'produce disease-resistant crops'. There are also minor errors in word form, such as 'information's' (which is uncountable). To improve, focus on learning common collocations and ensuring that you use academic vocabulary in the correct context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with articles, subject-verb agreement, and punctuation. For example, 'the individual face' should be 'individuals face', and 'it is impossible to handle pandemic' requires an article. There are also issues with sentence boundaries, such as comma splices where full stops are needed. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to limit the score. Focusing on proofreading for basic subject-verb agreement and article usage will significantly improve your accuracy.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.