Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-07-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The most crucial way of science should be to extend the individual's life. I totally agree with this given statement because there are two essential factors : researchers devoted more in science and modern technology due to live effective ways in each individuals. Secondly, science and technology such as AI and robotics are very helpful in our society.

Researchers and other scientist was devoted and try to make the effective ways how peoples can live with sustainable ways. Furthermore many countries such as : China and Japan were try to save the global energy and make the ecosystem more viable. In fact Automotives firms are changing in cars can be load with battery rather than fuel or gas , due to this, the pollution spread less as well as save the fuels and gases.

What's more : recent technologies such as AI and robotics were significantly assist individuals' life such as, AI can help appropriate decision and can also be assist pharmacy and other professional doctors and academic teachers. Robotics can also introduce certain restaurants and major hotels as a waiter or managers, In fact some restaurants can also provide numerous tasks for instance data management and collect feedback. therefore i strongly believe that upcoming science and AI can impact significantly and make easy people's lives.

In conclusion, in this certain era science devoted individual's lives and make peaceful of each people's life. However, AI and robotics were significantly assist in several places which also cause to unemployment. But it can also help a lot.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of the statement. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While you mention environmental sustainability and the role of AI/robotics, the arguments are often repetitive and lack depth. For instance, the discussion on AI is quite general, and the link between 'improving lives' and the specific examples provided could be more explicitly articulated. To reach a higher band, ensure that each paragraph focuses on a distinct, well-supported argument that directly relates to the core theme of improving human life, rather than simply listing technological advancements.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'What's more :' and 'In fact'. Some transitions between sentences are abrupt, and the logical progression within paragraphs could be smoother. For example, the shift from environmental issues to AI in the third paragraph feels disjointed. Improving the variety and accuracy of linking words and ensuring that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence would significantly enhance the flow of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but it lacks the precision and range required for higher bands. There are several instances of awkward phrasing, such as 'The most crucial way of science' (should be 'aim') and 'Automotives firms are changing in cars can be load with battery'. You rely on a limited set of words, and some collocations are unnatural. To improve, focus on using more academic vocabulary and ensuring that words are used in their correct grammatical context. Expanding your range of synonyms and topic-specific terminology will help convey your ideas more effectively.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Issues include subject-verb agreement ('Researchers and other scientist was devoted'), incorrect verb tenses ('were try to save'), and awkward sentence construction ('make peaceful of each people's life'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the use of colons and commas. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Focus on proofreading for basic agreement and tense consistency.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.