Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-07-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

i strongly agreee with the statement science should have aim to improve the people lives. as we see that most of the countries, like america, europen countries, have improve there enviorment, there life style by doing more inovation in science. they bulid there city more attrative with the help of science. as they build high rise buliding that can stand stright to 2000 meter or more. they develop unique infrastruture which admire people who visit first time. moreover they develop net of roads that make people life easy, comfortable and fast. also they develop theme parks in which the rides is the straight example of the science. Also it help them to have more tourisem in the country.

Pakistan has more beautiful hill sides, they develop the road net in between those hill, tunnels show the big example of the technology. with both beauty and science made it tourist place. which helpfull in finace of the country.

AI is the good example of the science as it is involove in our daily life routine. also it is stilling our jobs too. you see the all the soical media is now adding the AI feature in the applications. most of the countries life china and usa create robots to get some labour work. nowadays tecnology is so develop they create wait robots which serve the customer orders. also they develop the delivery robot to which is kind of drone. who deliver order through the air which also help to reduce the traffic from the roads.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by expressing a clear agreement with the statement. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. While you provide examples like infrastructure in Pakistan and AI, the connection back to the core argument—that the 'most important aim' of science should be improving lives—is not fully explored or nuanced. The essay tends to list examples rather than critically analyzing the extent to which science should prioritize human welfare over other potential aims, such as pure discovery or environmental preservation. To reach a higher band, you should aim to provide more depth in your reasoning and ensure your arguments are consistently linked to the prompt.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the logical progression between ideas is often disjointed. You use some cohesive devices like 'moreover' and 'also', but they are used in a repetitive and mechanical way. The transition between the paragraph about infrastructure and the paragraph about AI is abrupt. Furthermore, the referencing is sometimes unclear, such as in the sentence 'the rides is the straight example of the science,' where the connection to the previous point is weak. Improving the use of linking words and ensuring each paragraph has a clear topic sentence would significantly enhance the flow of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and range required for higher bands. There are frequent spelling errors, such as 'europen', 'enviorment', 'inovation', 'bulid', 'infrastruture', and 'tecnology'. Additionally, word choices are often simplistic or slightly inaccurate, such as 'net of roads' instead of 'road network' and 'stilling our jobs' instead of 'displacing workers'. To improve, focus on learning the correct spelling of common academic terms and expanding your range of collocations to express ideas more naturally and precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay relies heavily on simple sentence structures. While there are attempts at complex sentences, they are often marred by grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('the rides is', 'science should have aim') and missing articles ('the all the soical media'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with run-on sentences and missing commas. The frequency of these errors occasionally makes the text difficult to follow. To improve, you should focus on mastering basic sentence construction, specifically subject-verb agreement and the correct use of articles, before attempting more complex grammatical structures.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.