Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-07-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

As the most crucial aim of science should be to improve and support individuals lives. I believe science should asist to enhance people lives as there are certain research and approach could lead to significant development in daily life of humans.

Nowadays, there are such problems that are faced by many individuals in their daily life regarding issue like health and survival, which can easily tackled, if science involuemnt takes place in resolving the primary issue of health. As many people are suffering from life-threatuing diseases nowadays and in the past times also. For instance pandemic situations like COVID-19 virus was resolved through scientific experiments and approaches, through which it saved million of

lives and maintained the survival of maximal living. Therefore advancement in people's living standard by such development of electric car and public transport through scientific methods that are supporting human lives securely.

However, Science would not only supports the problems that arise in human living, As science is also evolving in environmental conversation and theoretical study with practical experiments in space exploration that helps in advanced studies like physics. which could be that a part of daily life routine but can become long-term advantage in long-term period for the survival of every organisms and humans

living in the world. As these steps made through science development which can make a comfort and risk free life.

To conclude, I firmly maintain that science involvement plays a vital role in every aspect that related to any issue which can become a great threat to planet. By providing numerous benefits it will impact individuals positively with long term development with overall well being.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses the prompt by discussing the role of science in improving lives. The position is clear from the introduction, and the main ideas—health and environmental/theoretical research—are relevant. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the transition between health and environmental science is abrupt, and the explanation of how space exploration relates to the prompt's core theme of 'improving lives' could be more explicitly linked. While the task is addressed, the supporting arguments lack depth and specific detail, keeping the response at a Band 6 level.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear progression of ideas from the introduction to the conclusion. However, the use of cohesive devices is sometimes mechanical or inaccurate. For example, the phrase 'As science is also evolving in environmental conversation' is grammatically disjointed, and the use of 'which could be that a part of daily life' creates confusion. Paragraphing is present, but the internal flow within paragraphs is occasionally hindered by awkward sentence structures and missing transitions, which affects the overall coherence.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but there are frequent errors in word choice and collocation. Examples include 'science involuemnt' (involvement), 'maximal living' (which is unclear), and 'environmental conversation' (likely meant 'conservation'). While the student attempts to use more academic vocabulary, the inaccuracies sometimes impede the precision of the argument. The range is sufficient to communicate the main points, but the lack of control over word forms and collocations prevents a higher score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally make the text difficult to follow. Issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'Science would not only supports'), sentence fragments (e.g., 'As the most crucial aim...'), and punctuation errors. While the meaning is generally conveyed, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar and sentence construction limits the score. The student needs to focus on sentence boundaries and ensuring that complex structures are formed correctly.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.