Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-07-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Until recently, there have been enormous changes in the way people's lives are affected by breakthroughs in technology. In this ultra modern epoch, There are certain individuals who believe that science should enhance individuals lives. In my opinion, I agree with the given statement and all the reasons behind my perspective will be elaborated in the subsequent paragraph.

Fundamentally, it entails a myriad of reasons and the predominant one is innovation in medical. This is because it is widely acknowledge that innovation in medical field plays a paramount significant role in saving citizens life. What could be a better example than Covid, where everyone was looking helpless and it had catastrophic effect, but science come forward and saved humankind. Moreover, weather forecast is also one of the grave reasons. One cannot deny the fact that it contribute significantly to protect human lives. Even though, there are different ways available to determine weather, but the technology provided by scientist predicts accurately about flood, rain and heat wave. Therefore, the significant aim of science should be to save citizens lives.

Furthermore, it is , incontestably, true that there are millions of humans who sleep without eating food. Science can also play pivotal role in decreasing the global hunger. Since, there is certain countries where citizens live in poverty and do not have sufficient income, but science can make alternative food options so every human have access to food and water.

To conclude, it can be restated that although there are tremendous of problems in the world, but science should try to improve individual lives.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout. The ideas, such as medical innovation and addressing global hunger, are relevant to the topic. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the point about global hunger is introduced but lacks specific examples or a deeper explanation of how science specifically addresses it beyond 'alternative food options'. While the main points are clear, the supporting arguments could be more thoroughly extended to reach a higher band. The conclusion is also quite brief and does not fully synthesize the arguments presented in the body paragraphs.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear progression of ideas. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Fundamentally', 'Moreover', and 'Furthermore', which help guide the reader. However, some of the transitions feel slightly mechanical, and there are instances where referencing is a bit unclear, such as the phrase 'it entails a myriad of reasons' which does not clearly refer back to the previous sentence. Paragraphing is used appropriately, but the final paragraph is very short and lacks the depth expected for a strong conclusion.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, with some attempts at more sophisticated language like 'ultra modern epoch', 'catastrophic effect', and 'pivotal role'. However, there are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'innovation in medical' (should be 'the medical field'), 'paramount significant role' (redundant), and 'tremendous of problems' (grammatically incorrect). While the meaning is always clear, the range of vocabulary is somewhat limited, and the errors in collocation prevent the response from reaching a higher band.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors throughout the text, such as 'science come forward' (should be 'came'), 'it contribute' (should be 'contributes'), and 'every human have' (should be 'has'). Additionally, there are punctuation and capitalization issues, such as the unnecessary capitalization of 'There' in the first paragraph. While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to demonstrate a lack of consistent control over complex structures, which is characteristic of a Band 6 performance.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.