Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, we must remember that the main purpose of science to improve humans lives. I strongly agree with this statement because scientific developments provide many benefits to society. For example, people can stay healthy through medical improvements and also, improve their economical situation by using modern technologies.

Firstly, science developed too much researchers on medical field. When people face too much health issues in past, Nowadays, we find solutions of it. Moreover, scientific improvements find vaccinations for dangerous ill. Such as, cancer and covid-19. In addition, living standard increase so people live more than they did in past. For example, my relative uncle was a cancer patient, received a modern treatment and with the help of modern technology equipment, now they are out of illness.

Secondly, if individuals want to improve their economy. they can make a use of modern technologies for some challenges. Artificial intelligence growing rapidly in recent years, so it help peoples to make difficult task more convenient and easier. In addition, it consume over little time and make task very faster than we make in previous. For example, if we have to find mistakes in our work so we just have to upload a photo, than AI will find our problems and teach us how to improve work in easier way. Also, this technology helps to grow business and as well as, our personal growth.

In my view, scientific tasks developed our life in many ways and they should focus to improves peoples lives and make their life more simple.

In conclusion, we should remember that the main purpose of science is to enhance individuals life. Although technology provides many benefits to society.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of the statement. The ideas are relevant, focusing on medical and economic advancements. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the discussion on AI is quite general and lacks a deeper exploration of how science specifically improves lives beyond mere convenience. While the position is consistent, the supporting arguments could be more nuanced to reach a higher band. The conclusion is also slightly underdeveloped, as it trails off without fully synthesizing the main points presented in the body paragraphs.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the progression of ideas. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Firstly,' 'Secondly,' and 'In conclusion,' though some transitions feel mechanical or repetitive. There are instances where the flow is interrupted by awkward phrasing, such as the sentence 'When people face too much health issues in past, Nowadays, we find solutions of it.' Referencing is occasionally unclear, and the logical connection between sentences could be smoother to ensure a more natural flow of information throughout the text.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the student to communicate their ideas clearly. However, the range is somewhat limited, and there are frequent errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'too much researchers,' 'dangerous ill,' and 'make a use of.' These errors do not prevent understanding, but they do indicate a lack of precision. To improve, the student should focus on learning collocations and using more academic vocabulary appropriate for an IELTS essay, rather than relying on basic or incorrectly applied terms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'living standard increase'), incorrect verb tenses (e.g., 'science developed too much researchers'), and misuse of articles or prepositions. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with sentence fragments and comma splices, such as 'if individuals want to improve their economy. they can make a use of...' While the meaning is generally clear, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar structures limits the score for this criterion.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.