Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The science play an important role on each sector like the health, technology and nature. The main aim of science should be to improve the human's lives and help them in certain ways. I agree to this sentence because having innovations in multiple domain can benefit people significantly.
Having new creativity and innovation can help humans many ways. For example, having the equipment like detecting the disease like cancer at early stage can help in saving life. In point of technology should be new innovation like doing work by AI and robots which make people easy to work and stress free. There can be improve in the AQI by help of the science which can help to purify the air. In the space sector if we find the minerals and elements in other planets which can be benefit for people in future.
Such roles in science can help humans in working more substantially, reliably and convenient way. But such activity can some time bring disaster to people. If science do all the things that people can become lazy and things can lead to no productivity. For using any high equipment there should be the high level of knowledge to use it. Another major thing is if person can afford the things.
In conclusion, I believe that science can be beneficial to human by creating new things which can bring glory in every sector like healthcare. preserving nature and teh
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The essay addresses the prompt by discussing the role of science in improving human lives, but it fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 250 words, which negatively impacts the score. While the position is clear, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. For instance, the mention of space exploration and AI is relevant but lacks depth. The conclusion is incomplete, cutting off mid-sentence, which indicates a failure to fully develop the final part of the response. To improve, you should expand on your examples with more specific details and ensure the essay is fully completed to meet the length requirement.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the flow between ideas is often mechanical. You use some cohesive devices like 'For example' and 'In conclusion,' but the transitions between sentences are sometimes abrupt. The logical progression is hindered by the incomplete nature of the final paragraph. Additionally, some sentences are disjointed, such as 'In point of technology should be new innovation,' which makes the argument difficult to follow. To improve, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence that connects logically to the next.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and range required for higher bands. You rely on basic terms like 'important role,' 'good,' and 'things.' There are also issues with word choice and collocation, such as 'having the equipment like detecting the disease' and 'make people easy to work.' Some terms are used incorrectly, such as 'having new creativity.' To achieve a higher score, try to incorporate more academic vocabulary and precise collocations related to the topic of science and societal impact.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede communication. Examples include 'The science play an important role on each sector,' 'There can be improve in the AQI,' and 'if science do all the things.' Subject-verb agreement and article usage are inconsistent throughout the text. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar prevents a higher score. Focus on proofreading for subject-verb agreement and ensuring correct verb forms in conditional sentences.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.