Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

I completely agree with the statement that focus of science is increasing the life standard of human being. I agree that science is making great inventions for the people Artificial intelligence is one big achievement done by technology and reaching to the space is the another biggest reward by science to human being.

Firstly, science and technology is working every day for the best of human life Artificial intelligence is the great implementation by the technical industry which made human life more easy and effective in various ways. For instance, as per the research done by Anthropic AI has been reduced human load almost 40 percent for basic tasks they are performing every day which help them to focus on more important areas to get a good output in their workings.

Secondly, space research is the another big add on by the science in the human life it is working on the research of finding another places to live on another planets for the mankind its still in progress and giving good results. For example, a new implementation done by ISRO on the Moon through which they found the water over the space for life. Gradually, research is going on other factor required for life which is essential for life undoubtedly, all these research more focus on humans.

In conclusion, I believe science did great achievements for habitants. AI make people work easy in their routine tasks or finding space to leave on another areas of the space is more focus on mankind we can see easily as compare to any other. So people can live their life easily and peacefully.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position and providing relevant examples, such as AI and space exploration. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. While you mention AI and ISRO, the explanations are brief and lack depth. To reach a higher band, you should expand on the 'why' and 'how'—for example, explaining the societal impact of scientific advancements beyond just stating they exist. The conclusion is a bit repetitive, restating points already made rather than synthesizing them. The response is relevant, but the arguments need more thorough elaboration to fully satisfy the 'well-developed' requirement of higher bands.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or repetitive. For instance, the transition 'Firstly' and 'Secondly' is used, but the internal flow within paragraphs is sometimes disjointed due to missing punctuation and run-on sentences. Referencing is occasionally unclear, such as in the phrase 'all these research more focus on humans,' where the connection to the previous sentence is weak. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring that sentences are clearly separated by punctuation would significantly improve the flow and logical progression of your arguments.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and range required for higher bands. You rely on basic descriptors like 'big,' 'good,' and 'easy.' There are also some awkward collocations, such as 'the another big add on' and 'finding another places to live.' While your meaning is clear, the lack of sophisticated or academic vocabulary limits your score. To improve, focus on using more precise academic collocations and avoiding informal phrasing. Expanding your range to include topic-specific terminology related to science and ethics would also be beneficial.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation that occasionally impede readability. Common issues include missing articles ('the focus of science'), subject-verb agreement errors ('science did great achievements'), and run-on sentences where ideas are joined without proper punctuation. For example, 'Artificial intelligence is the great implementation by the technical industry which made human life more easy' lacks a comma and uses an awkward structure. You need to focus on basic sentence construction, specifically ensuring that every sentence has a clear subject, verb, and correct punctuation to avoid these frequent slips.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.