Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-15
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In the recent years, technology has reached on its peak and new inventions are done in the field of science. These inventions has strong relation with people's lives as health science is discovering numerous ways to enhance people's lives.I completely agree that ultimate goal of science should be to enhance an individual's survival.
The initial reason is that, increased lives of an individual will encourage socialism. As we know, social gatherings are decreasing due to busy schedules and stressful life.If there is a presence of grandparents in the house,the presence of them itself means a lot everytime for a specific family.Secondly,it supports traditions present in the society.Without lives,there is no significance of any rituals.So, on the basis of today's scinario,science should focus more to improve people's lives to encourage socialism and to support traditions in the society.
The diet patterns of today's youngsters invites various diseases in their body affacting people's lives. Science is a huge factor that can help those suffering with any specific diseases. In additon,there are wide range of medicines available along with surgeries to get rid of health problems.These all efforts related to the field of healthcare goes to science as it contributes major hand in it.for an example,junk food leads to obesity.In the recent years,public is consuming more junk food day by day.Here,science enhances people's lives by surgeries which can help live longer.
Ultimately,it is crucial for science to improve an indiviual's life as people's lives support socialism and traditions present in the society.Though there are various ways available to survive by science,today's diet patterns indicates that science should prioritise initially for public's lives.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive. The argument linking 'science' to 'socialism' (likely meaning social cohesion) and 'traditions' is underdeveloped and lacks logical clarity, making it difficult for the reader to follow the connection between scientific advancement and these social concepts. While the second body paragraph provides a more concrete link between science and healthcare, the explanation remains superficial. To reach a higher band, you should provide more specific, well-reasoned examples that directly support your central argument rather than relying on general statements.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear introduction and conclusion. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or slightly awkward, such as the repetitive use of 'In the recent years' or 'In addition'. The flow between sentences is sometimes disjointed, particularly in the second paragraph where the transition from social gatherings to traditions feels abrupt. Referencing is occasionally unclear, and the logical progression of ideas within paragraphs could be improved by using a wider variety of linking words and ensuring that each sentence builds naturally upon the previous one.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety required for higher bands. There are instances of word-choice errors, such as 'reached on its peak' (should be 'reached its peak') and 'socialism' (which refers to a political system, whereas you likely meant 'social cohesion' or 'social bonds'). The phrasing is often repetitive, and there is little evidence of less common lexical items or idiomatic collocations. To improve, focus on using more precise academic vocabulary and ensuring that words are used in their correct context.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('These inventions has', 'diet patterns... invites'), missing articles ('in the field of science'), and punctuation errors (missing spaces after commas and periods). While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to distract the reader. To achieve a higher score, you need to demonstrate better control over complex structures and pay closer attention to basic grammatical accuracy, particularly subject-verb agreement and article usage.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.