Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In recent decades, science and technology have become a subject of intense debate. It is widely considered that the main aim of science should be to improve people's life. I largely agree with the given notion. The narrative ahead shall articulate the reason behind my belief along with contradictory aspect before arriving at a rational conclusion.

To begin with, science and technology have almost made people life easier and comfortable. Most inventions such as mobile phones, cars, internet, computer and many more. These devices are helping people to perform their daily tasks easily. In practical terms, this means science always been used for making comfortable life for people . Due to these inventions, people performs their task on their fingertips. People do whatever they want to do with these technologies and behind every technology science is present. Because of science no invention is possible. As a result, it's always been used for mankind and their development. To illustrate this because of mobile phones people know about the latest update and everything happens around the globe. In a such way internet and computer people can work, while traveling in different country in a different time zone. These way it improved people's life.

Secondly, because of science space exploration can be possible. now, people can travel to outside of earth. Also the some scientists say, in few decades people will leave in others planets. These will happened because they know science concepts about gravity. For the centuries, science have used for people.

On other hand, the development which have happened because of science. Have some consequence such as environmental degradation, technological dependency and changes in lifestyles. Due to development it impact negatively on people's life. If it left unadressed, the problem could esclate. As a result, technology and science give rise to environmental problem, and human heavily depend on agriculture.

To conclude, even though science and techonolgy have negative impact on environment, changes in lifestyle and technological dependency. However, I believe that it always use for human beings and it main aim has always been to improve people life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position and providing supporting arguments. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. For instance, the second paragraph lists inventions like 'mobile phones' and 'cars' but lacks a deep explanation of how these specifically improve lives beyond general statements. The counter-argument in the fourth paragraph is brief and lacks specific examples, making the discussion feel a bit repetitive. To reach a higher band, you should provide more nuanced examples and ensure that the link between science and the improvement of human life is explored with greater depth and analytical rigor.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the progression of ideas. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or repetitive. Phrases like 'To begin with', 'Secondly', and 'On other hand' are used, but the internal flow within paragraphs is sometimes disjointed. For example, the transition between discussing mobile phones and the internet in the second paragraph is abrupt. Additionally, some sentences are fragmented, such as 'Most inventions such as mobile phones, cars, internet, computer and many more', which lacks a main verb and disrupts the logical flow of the argument.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety required for higher bands. You rely on basic terms like 'good', 'bad', and 'things' (implied through repetitive use of 'inventions' and 'devices'). There are also noticeable errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'people performs their task on their fingertips' (should be 'at their fingertips') and 'science always been used' (missing auxiliary verb). To improve, try to incorporate more academic collocations and precise terminology related to scientific advancement and societal impact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede readability. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('people performs'), missing articles ('in different country'), and tense inconsistencies ('science have used'). Some sentences are incomplete or poorly constructed, such as 'To illustrate this because of mobile phones people know about the latest update'. While the meaning is generally clear, the high frequency of these errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for subject-verb agreement would be highly beneficial.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.