Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-17
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is true that the main vision of science should be to improve people's livelihood. While the invention of science has a number of priority area, I strongly believe that it should be focus on welfare of society.
Science should be empasize on the improvement people's lives for a number of reasons. One possible reason is that people are one of the most significant elements in the earth. Population in the earth is increasing day by day, but the environmental resources such as food are not increasing at a same rate. By doing advance research, science can ensure the sustainable food system. As a result, citizen may not face scarcity of food in society. Furthurmore, science can also improve the health care facility by inventing different variety of vaccine. Because some disease, such as, cancer has no any medicine in the world, and patient who suffer from this cure disease has the higher possibility to get death.
Moreover, people are suffering from different kinds of environmental problems, such as, air polllution, water polllution and so on. If scientist can develop an advance scientific method of making air and water safe, it will make the environment free from pollution. In addition, science can also make people life easier by inventing different technologies, like, mobile phone and internet.
In conclusion, since there are a number of activities interlink and affect people's life , I firmly agree with the view that science should be given more priority to improve the lifestyle of people's.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout. The ideas are relevant, focusing on food security, healthcare, and environmental protection. However, the development is somewhat superficial. For example, the mention of 'cancer' and 'death' is a bit simplistic and lacks a nuanced explanation of how scientific research specifically bridges the gap between current limitations and future solutions. While the main points are clear, they could benefit from more detailed elaboration to reach a higher band. The conclusion reinforces the position, but the overall argument remains at a general level rather than exploring the complexity of the topic.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear central theme. Cohesive devices such as 'One possible reason', 'Furthermore', 'Moreover', and 'In conclusion' are used to guide the reader. However, the use of these devices is sometimes mechanical, and there are instances where the flow between sentences feels slightly disjointed. For example, the transition between the discussion of food scarcity and healthcare is abrupt. Additionally, the referencing is occasionally unclear, such as in the phrase 'some disease, such as, cancer has no any medicine', which disrupts the logical progression of the argument.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety required for higher bands. There are several instances of awkward phrasing or incorrect word choices, such as 'invention of science' (instead of 'scientific advancement'), 'empasize on' (spelling error and incorrect preposition), and 'get death' (unnatural collocation). While the student attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'sustainable food system' and 'environmental resources', the overall range is limited, and errors in spelling ('polllution', 'Furthurmore') and word formation occasionally distract the reader.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there is a high frequency of grammatical errors. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('science should be empasize'), article usage ('in the earth' instead of 'on Earth'), and awkward sentence construction ('patient who suffer from this cure disease has the higher possibility to get death'). While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are persistent throughout the text. To improve, the student should focus on basic sentence construction, correct verb forms, and the appropriate use of articles.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.