Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-18

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

I agree that improving people's lives should be the main aim of science. Science has many purposes but health and daily life are especially important.

First of all science is very important for improving people's health and saving lives. Scientists develop new medicines and vaccines that help prevent many diseases. In addition modern medical machines help doctor find diseases at any early stage so patients can get treatment quickly. For example COVID-19 vaccines helped protect millions of people from serious illness. Therefore scientific progress can make people lives healthier and safer.

Secondly, science makes our daily lives easier and more comfortable. Modern technology helps people communicate with each other quickly through smartphones and the internet. it also saves time by making many tasks easier to complete. For example electric vehicles can reduce air pollution and make transportation more environmentally friendly. Therefore, scientific development has a positive effect on people everyday lives. However , science is not only used to improve peoples daily lives . it also helps us understand nature, space and the universe. However, I believe that scientific research should mainly focus on areas that can provide benefits to society. These discover can increase our knowledge and help future generation.

In conclusion, science has many purposes,, but I believe that improving people lives should be its main aim. It helps to improve health make daily life easier and create a better future for society. In my opinion this will help crate a healthier safer and more comfortable society in the future

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, clearly stating a position in favor of the statement. The ideas are relevant, focusing on health and daily life, and are supported by examples such as COVID-19 vaccines and electric vehicles. However, the development is somewhat basic. While the essay acknowledges that science has other purposes, such as understanding the universe, this point is not fully integrated into the argument. To reach a higher band, the student should provide more depth in the analysis of why these other areas might be secondary to improving human life, rather than just listing them. The position is clear throughout, but the overall development remains at a standard level.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'First of all', 'In addition', 'Secondly', and 'In conclusion' are used to guide the reader. However, the use of these devices is somewhat mechanical and repetitive. Additionally, there are some issues with punctuation and sentence flow, such as the awkward spacing in 'However , science' and the double commas in 'purposes,,'. Paragraphing is used appropriately, but the transition between the idea of scientific discovery for knowledge and the focus on societal benefit could be smoother to improve the overall flow.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task but lacks variety and sophistication. The student relies on common words like 'important', 'good', and 'make'. While there are some attempts at topic-specific vocabulary (e.g., 'scientific progress', 'environmentally friendly', 'scientific research'), the range is limited. There are also several minor errors in word form and usage, such as 'people lives' instead of 'people's lives' and 'discover' instead of 'discoveries'. To improve, the student should aim to incorporate more precise academic collocations and avoid repetitive phrasing to demonstrate a wider lexical range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent errors in punctuation and grammar. Examples include missing possessive apostrophes ('people lives', 'peoples daily lives'), capitalization errors ('it also saves time'), and missing articles. The sentence structure is often predictable, and while there is an attempt at complex sentences, the control is inconsistent. The errors do not impede communication, but they are frequent enough to prevent a higher score. Focusing on proofreading for basic grammatical accuracy, particularly apostrophes and sentence boundaries, would significantly improve the quality of the writing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.