Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-19
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Science always plays a very vital role in the development and advancements in society for the improvement in the people's lives. I fully agree with this argument that science should aim to improve the people's daily lives.
It is human nature to always search for scientific advancements that will ultimately help him to achieve comfort in his daily life. Sciences opened many paths for humankind to explore and adapt to new advancements, which are made only possible by science. There are many examples in which you can say that science helps humans to survive in this world. It is science that developed different kinds of medicines and antibiotics in order to cure deadly diseases. It is science that made it possible for us to communicate with any person around the world by using smartphones. Moreover, travelling becomes quite easy and comfortable because of all the technological advancements due to science. We have access to easily travel from one country to another country with the help of aeroplanes. Science is involved in our day-to-day life. Everything that made the people's lives easy and comfortable is because of this. It is very important that science should be used for the betterment of society rather than for personal gains.
In conclusion, I would say science is very beneficial for society, but it also imposes some dangers on humanity. Government should invest in the proper monitoring of scientists so that they can develop valuable products for humans that will improve their daily lives.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt by expressing a clear position in favor of science improving lives. However, the essay falls slightly short of the 250-word minimum requirement, which impacts the depth of development. While the ideas regarding medicine and communication are relevant, they are somewhat repetitive and lack detailed analysis. The conclusion introduces a new point about the dangers of science, which is not explored in the body paragraphs, making the argument feel slightly unbalanced. To reach a higher band, you should expand on your examples with more specific details and ensure all points raised in the conclusion have been discussed in the body.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the argument. There is a logical progression from the introduction to the body and conclusion. However, the use of cohesive devices is somewhat mechanical and repetitive (e.g., 'It is science that...'). Some transitions between sentences feel abrupt, and the referencing could be more varied. To improve, try using a wider range of linking words and phrases to connect ideas more fluidly, and ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence that guides the reader through your argument.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary used is generally adequate for the task, but it lacks the sophistication and precision required for higher bands. There is a reliance on basic, repetitive phrasing such as 'very vital,' 'daily lives,' and 'easy and comfortable.' While the meaning is always clear, the range of vocabulary is limited, and there is little evidence of less common lexical items or idiomatic collocations. To improve, focus on using more precise synonyms and academic collocations to express your ideas with greater nuance and variety.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the grammar is generally accurate and communication is not impeded, there are some minor errors and awkward phrasings, such as 'travelling becomes quite easy' and 'Everything that made the people's lives easy... is because of this.' The range of structures is somewhat limited, relying heavily on 'It is...' cleft sentences. To achieve a higher score, incorporate a wider variety of complex grammatical structures, such as conditional sentences or passive voice, while maintaining accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.