Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 7.5)

It is often argued that improving people's lives should be the primary objective of scientific advancement. I completely agree with this view because scientific research can protect people from dangerous working conditions and contribute to major improvements in health and everyday life.

One of the most important ways in which science can improve people's lives is by reducing human involvement in hazardous activities. Certain occupations, such as mining, deep-sea exploration and the construction of high-rise structures, expose workers to considerable risks. Advances in robotics and artificial intelligence can enable machines to perform many of these tasks, thereby reducing the likelihood of serious injuries and deaths. For example, robots can be used to explore dangerous mining sites before workers enter them, allowing potential hazards to be identified without putting human lives at risk. Therefore, scientific progress can make workplaces considerably safer while also increasing efficiency.

Another major contribution of science is its ability to improve people's health and quality of life. Medical research has led to the development of vaccines, diagnostic technologies and treatments that have increased life expectancy and reduced the impact of numerous diseases. In addition, scientific advances have produced technologies that make everyday activities more convenient. Smartphones, the internet and digital communication, for instance, allow people to access information and communicate with others almost instantly, regardless of geographical distance. These developments have transformed how people work, study and maintain relationships.

Admittedly, scientific discoveries can sometimes have negative consequences if they are misused. Artificial intelligence, for example, may create privacy concerns, while technological devices can contribute to excessive screen time and electronic waste. However, these risks do not undermine the fundamental value of science. Instead, they demonstrate the need for appropriate regulation and responsible use of scientific discoveries.

In conclusion, I strongly agree that improving people's lives should be the most important aim of science. Whether by protecting people from dangerous work, advancing healthcare or making everyday activities more convenient, scientific progress has the greatest value when it contributes to human well-being.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.5
Coherence and Cohesion7.5
Lexical Resource7.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy7.5
Overall7.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5

You have fully addressed all parts of the prompt. Your position is clear from the introduction and is maintained consistently throughout the essay. Each body paragraph provides relevant, well-developed arguments, such as the use of robotics in hazardous industries and the role of medical research in increasing life expectancy. You also effectively acknowledge the counter-argument regarding potential misuse, which adds depth to your analysis. The ideas are well-supported with specific examples, demonstrating a strong ability to extend your arguments logically. The conclusion effectively synthesises your main points and reinforces your initial stance.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5

The essay is logically organised with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the transition between paragraphs is smooth. You use a variety of cohesive devices effectively, such as 'One of the most important ways', 'In addition', 'Admittedly', and 'In conclusion'. These markers help the reader follow your argument without difficulty. The paragraphing is logical and contributes to the overall clarity of the response. There is no evidence of mechanical or repetitive use of linking words; the flow is natural and professional.

Lexical Resource — Band 7.5

You demonstrate a wide and flexible range of vocabulary that is well-suited to the academic nature of the task. Phrases such as 'hazardous activities', 'geographical distance', 'fundamental value', and 'appropriate regulation' show a high level of lexical control. You use collocations accurately and avoid repetitive language. While the vocabulary is precise and sophisticated, it remains natural and does not feel forced. There are no spelling errors, and the word choices consistently convey your intended meaning with precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.5

Your writing displays a wide range of complex structures, including conditional clauses, relative clauses, and passive voice constructions. The majority of your sentences are error-free, and your control over punctuation is excellent. For example, your use of commas to separate clauses and lists is consistently accurate. There are no significant grammatical errors that impede communication. The sentence structures are varied, which keeps the reader engaged and demonstrates a high level of grammatical competence. The essay is polished and reflects a strong command of English syntax.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.