Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Modern era reveals that people tend to believe the information based on the facts that is supported by science. The main objective of science must be aligned to people's progress. I think that everybody should support their lives with leading science and have better life.

Science considered to be broad discipline which consists of vast information about the Earth and its creatures. People who want answers to their enigmatic questions should research in science.

Science has many solutions related to human nature and the only way to reveal the answer is to consider its importance in daily life. However, Everyone tries to avoid scientific reasons for their adverse doubts end up losing control of their life. For example, Science helps humans to live healthy life, as it provides numerous details about nutritious diet.

Science should be fundamental course for every human being to survive meaningful life. I believe that instead of disproving science as a false book, it should be first priority of finding solution for people's difficult situations. Scientific theories are gems for current generation because of their careful research and findings, which turns human lives easier to work on improving it further. Not only that but also use them in dealing with uncertainty. Science also had great developments in the areas like technology and computer, the most trending field is Artificial Intelligence.

Recent studies shows that nowadays majority of people are using Artificial Intelligence for every doubt be it personal or professional. This proves that science make life much simpler and productive for humans in every aspect of life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The essay addresses the prompt by arguing that science should focus on improving lives. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. While you mention health and technology, the arguments lack depth and specific, well-explained examples. For instance, the reference to 'Artificial Intelligence' is a good start, but it is not clearly linked back to the core argument of how it specifically improves human life in a profound way. The position is clear, but the supporting points are often repetitive or vague, which prevents the response from reaching a higher band. To improve, ensure each paragraph has a clear topic sentence followed by a detailed explanation and a concrete example.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, and there is a logical progression of ideas. However, the use of cohesive devices is sometimes mechanical or slightly unnatural. For example, the transition 'Not only that but also use them in dealing with uncertainty' is grammatically awkward and lacks a clear subject. Some sentences feel disconnected from the previous ones, making the flow feel a bit disjointed. While the paragraphing is sufficient, the internal cohesion within paragraphs could be strengthened by using a wider variety of linking words and ensuring that pronouns and references are clearly linked to their antecedents.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, such as 'enigmatic', 'fundamental', and 'productive'. However, there are instances of imprecise word choice and collocation errors, such as 'Science considered to be broad discipline' (missing 'is') and 'turns human lives easier' (should be 'makes'). Some phrasing is also repetitive, particularly the use of 'life' and 'science' throughout the text. To reach a higher band, focus on using more precise collocations and avoiding repetitive vocabulary by employing synonyms or rephrasing sentences to show a more sophisticated control of language.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede the flow. Common issues include missing articles ('Science considered to be broad discipline'), subject-verb agreement errors ('Recent studies shows'), and awkward phrasing ('Everyone tries to avoid scientific reasons for their adverse doubts end up losing control'). While the meaning is generally clear, these persistent errors prevent the writing from being considered 'error-free' in the majority of sentences. Focusing on basic grammatical accuracy, particularly article usage and verb forms, will significantly improve your score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.