Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Science is a subject which provides us knowledge about everyday phenomena and their different aspects. It covers all the objects from atomic level to macroscopic level and then help us to make new observation and conclusions which help mankind through different kind of ways. So basically main aim of science should be to make people’s life more easier. As we know throughout the years science has enabled humans to make different kind of gadgets and devices to help mankind in daily life problems. Nowadays we are living in a world which is actually surrounded by scientific environment from a smart phone to a rocket moving towards moon science is everywhere making sure to make lives more easier. The main area to be focused is health sector where science has been used to develop new advanced methods and technologies to help people whether its in form of medicine or advanced technology based medical equipments, science is playing a crucial role in saving many lives every second and that’s why main aim of science must be to make people’s life more easier. As science is being used in manufacturing of disaterous weapons and equipments which are used in wars. This is dark side of using science for deterioration. Science must be used in beneficial way for people which covers several areas like health and Education sectors. The scientific robots are being made for daily life works and they are being used to decrease the risk of people exposure to deadly conditions like in fire departments.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position that science should prioritize improving lives. However, the development of ideas is somewhat repetitive, particularly the constant reiteration that science makes life 'easier.' While the mention of the 'dark side' (weapons) provides a counter-perspective, the argument lacks depth and specific, well-elaborated examples. The essay would benefit from more nuanced exploration of how science balances ethical concerns with progress. The conclusion is missing, which is a significant omission for a task of this nature, as it leaves the argument feeling incomplete.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into a single, long block of text rather than distinct paragraphs. This lack of paragraphing makes the progression of ideas difficult to follow. While there is a logical flow from the definition of science to its applications in health and then to ethical considerations, the absence of clear transitions between these points makes the structure feel mechanical. Cohesive devices are used, but they are often basic (e.g., 'As we know,' 'Nowadays,' 'So basically'). To improve, you should group related ideas into separate paragraphs and use a wider variety of linking words to connect your arguments more fluidly.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety required for a higher band. You rely heavily on repetitive phrases such as 'make people’s life more easier' and 'help mankind.' There are some inaccuracies in word choice, such as 'disaterous weapons' (likely meant 'destructive') and 'scientific environment.' While the meaning is clear, the range of vocabulary is limited, and there is little attempt to use less common or more sophisticated lexical items to demonstrate a higher level of language proficiency.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally affect readability. Issues include missing articles (e.g., 'in health sector'), incorrect pluralization (e.g., 'equipments' is uncountable), and awkward phrasing (e.g., 'science is a subject which provides us knowledge about'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with several run-on sentences that lack proper commas or conjunctions. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to prevent the essay from reaching a higher band. Focusing on subject-verb agreement and proper article usage would be beneficial.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.