Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-22
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
It is widely recognized that modern science and technology plays a crucial role in modern society. Some people believe that science is the most important goal should be improving individuals life style. Personally, I completely agree with this notion because of scientific progress can improve health, solve everyday problems, knowledge and skills, and I will discuss my supporting ideas further in this essay.
To begin with, one significant reason is that science has greatly improved healthcare. Medical research has produced vaccines, safer medicine, and treatments for many diseases, which can helps to people live longer and healthier lives. Scientists have developed more modern machinery that helps doctors can easily diagnose illnesses and risky surgery more accurately. For example, vaccines have protected millions of children and adults from dangerous diseases, while better hospitals use scientific technology to save people's lives.
Another important reason is that science makes daily life easier and support economic development. New technology has improves transport, farming, communication, and clean energy. In addition, farmers can grow more food with better methods, while renewable energy reduces pollution and protects natural resources. If people can use more technology in their everyday life, they can gain more knowledge and their develop personal skills. For instance, solar panels provide electricity to homes without producing harmful emissions. These inventions improve living standards, create new jobs, increase productivity, support businesses, and offer greater opportunities nationwide.
To conclude, I firmly believe that the main purpose of science should be improving health, education, protect environment, and practical solution that benefit society. This approach ensures that knowledge is used wisely, financial support, encourages innovation, protects future generations globally.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response addresses all parts of the prompt, clearly stating a position in the introduction and maintaining it throughout. The ideas are relevant, focusing on healthcare and economic/daily life benefits. However, the development is somewhat superficial; while examples like vaccines and solar panels are provided, the arguments could be extended further to explore the 'extent' of the agreement more deeply. The conclusion is a bit list-like and lacks a strong summary of the main arguments. Overall, the response is well-focused, but it stays within a safe, predictable range of ideas rather than exploring the topic with greater depth or nuance.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct ideas. Cohesive devices such as 'To begin with', 'In addition', and 'For instance' are used to guide the reader. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical, and there are instances where the flow is interrupted by minor grammatical errors or awkward phrasing, such as the list in the final paragraph. The progression of ideas is generally clear, but the internal cohesion within sentences could be improved to sound more natural and sophisticated.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing the student to express ideas clearly. There is an attempt to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'renewable energy', 'diagnose', and 'economic development'. However, the range is somewhat limited, and there are occasional errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'improving individuals life style' (should be 'improving individuals' lifestyles') and 'their develop personal skills' (should be 'develop their personal skills'). To reach a higher band, the student should incorporate more precise academic collocations and avoid repetitive phrasing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors that, while not impeding communication, are noticeable. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('science... plays', 'which can helps', 'technology has improves') and awkward sentence construction ('science is the most important goal should be improving'). Punctuation is generally functional, but the final paragraph contains a list that lacks grammatical parallelism. A wider range of error-free complex structures is needed to move into the 7.0+ range.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.