Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-24
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The most significant aim of science would be to boost human beings lives. In my opinion , I largely agree with the notion due to the latest innovations in science. However, it only depends on individuals how to take benefit.
To begin with, there are numerous inventions has been carried out by Scientists for saving the human life which are no support the individuals in living in their country. Firstly, In China 2020 Robotics invention is extremely supportive for the citizens living in China like mostly work in restaurants, offices, or homes is done by Robots which is highly beneficial for the citizens to take care of yourself like do some exercise which results in mentally and physically fit. Secondly, Invention of Artificial Intelligence CHATGPT is highly preferable and brilliant invention of Scientists when you are stuck in any situation like in office, school, university or even you are in anxiety it should be helpful.
Lastly, Google is the highly preferable invention for the individuals at that platform you can search any type of mystery or you want any kind of information regarding your university thesis or even you can also complete you thesis or assignment in this application . In my opinion, Nowadays, it is need of every sing citizen to improve their lives like search any query related to your health or diet they should be reply in couple of seconds.
In conclusion, Science exhibits a crucial role in human beings life it finally accepted with last innovations. Besides that, Nowadays working is continue for how to alleviates the individuals life related issues in the coming days with help of science.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt by expressing a clear position, but the development of ideas is limited. While you mention robotics, AI, and Google, the explanations are somewhat superficial and repetitive. For example, the section on robotics focuses on household chores but does not deeply connect this to the broader philosophical aim of science. To improve, ensure each paragraph provides a more analytical exploration of the topic rather than just listing examples. The conclusion is a bit vague and does not fully synthesize the arguments presented. Aim to provide more depth in your supporting points to move into a higher band.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or slightly awkward, such as the repetitive use of 'Firstly', 'Secondly', and 'Lastly'. Some transitions between sentences are abrupt, making the flow feel disjointed. For instance, the jump from discussing robotics to ChatGPT lacks a smooth logical bridge. To improve, try using a wider variety of linking words and ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence that connects back to your main argument.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but it lacks the precision and variety required for higher bands. You rely on basic descriptors like 'highly preferable' and 'brilliant invention' multiple times. There are also some awkward collocations, such as 'boost human beings lives' instead of 'improve the quality of human life'. To improve, focus on using more academic collocations and synonyms to avoid repetition. Expanding your range of topic-specific vocabulary related to scientific advancement would also be beneficial.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text that occasionally impede clarity. Examples include 'there are numerous inventions has been carried out' (subject-verb agreement), 'take care of yourself' (incorrect pronoun usage), and 'it is need of every sing citizen' (missing articles and spelling). The sentence structures are mostly simple or contain errors when attempting complexity. To improve, focus on mastering basic subject-verb agreement, article usage, and ensuring that your complex sentences are punctuated correctly. Proofreading for these common errors will significantly improve your score.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.