Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-02
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
In the few past decades, many individuals believe that the the most vital goal of science ought to be improve people lives. I partially agree with this viewpoint because science apart from this there are also other subjects who helps people lives.
On the one hand, science have numerous benefits in life because it helps to various conditions such as new invention and information. This is because these days people are using science in everything, they are inventing technology and enhance knowledge. As a result, people can use science and they can do everything in their life. Furthermore, nowadays technology is developing worldwide since it plays a major role new invention such as computers and medicines because if science is not exist people can face a lot of problems. Consequently, people could not make cars and computers. To illustrate, IT sector is growing in the world and they need a large number of professionals who have good knowledge in physics.
On the other hand, some individuals believe that apart from science there are also other subject which very crucial in the live because they do not want to depend since science only offer information about human body and critical thinking questions, but other subject gain people general knowledge and learn moral values For instance, people can consume knowledge about past invention and they can gain knowledge about freedom fighters.
To conclude, science is very cruical curriculum, but there are others sunject which gain knowledge heritage
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response addresses the prompt but fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 250 words, which negatively impacts the score. While you present a position, the development of ideas is limited and somewhat repetitive. The arguments regarding the importance of other subjects are underdeveloped and lack specific, logical examples to support the claim that they are as vital as science. To improve, ensure you fully explore your arguments with more depth and provide concrete, relevant examples. Additionally, the conclusion is abrupt and does not effectively summarize your main points or reinforce your position, leading to a lack of clarity in your overall argument.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as the repetitive use of 'this is because' and 'consequently'. Some transitions between sentences are abrupt, making the flow of ideas feel disjointed. For instance, the transition between the discussion of science and the introduction of other subjects is not smooth. To improve, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence that connects logically to the previous one.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is generally limited and repetitive, relying on basic terms like 'good', 'things', and 'subjects'. There are several instances of awkward phrasing and word choice errors, such as 'science is not exist' instead of 'science did not exist' and 'cruical curriculum'. These errors occasionally make the meaning unclear. To reach a higher band, you should aim to use more precise vocabulary related to the topic, such as 'technological advancement', 'scientific inquiry', or 'humanitarian impact', and work on improving your collocation skills to ensure words are used in natural combinations.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay contains frequent grammatical errors that sometimes impede communication. There are consistent issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'science have', 'subjects who helps'), article usage (e.g., 'the the'), and sentence structure. Complex sentence attempts are often faulty, leading to run-on sentences or fragments. While you demonstrate an attempt to use a variety of structures, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar limits the clarity of your writing. Focusing on mastering simple, error-free sentences before moving to more complex structures would be a beneficial strategy for improvement.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.