Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Many people beleive that the main goal of the science is to make human life better.I fully agree with thhe statement because science is most useful when it solves real world problems like health issues and poor living conditions.

First science has helped people live longer andhealtjier lives.In the past many people died from simple illness.However, scientist developed medicines, vaccines and clean water system that clean millions of lives.For example vaccines have completely removed dangerous diseases like polio.When science focus on human life soceity become stronger and happier.Science makes life more peaceful and very convenient. In farming modren machines are better seeds help grow more food to feed hungry people.

On the the other hand, science make our lives more easier and comfortable. for example:communication,we can communicate with people from other countries within seconds with the help of science, we can shop from home and pay bills in less time.people use computers to send email to others,learners use smartphones for study and leran new skills that can help them in their future as wellSome people argue that scientist should also study space or complex topic just to gain knowledge, while learning new fact is good, spending money on basic human need also come first.Exploring space is helpful but climate change and poverty is more vital on earth right now.

In conclusion, the mosat important aim of science is to enhance human life whilw curiousty is helpful scientific work should mainly focus on making the world a saferhealthy and easier place for everyone

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of science focusing on human improvement. The ideas are relevant, covering health, agriculture, and communication. However, the development is somewhat superficial. For instance, the argument regarding space exploration is introduced but not fully explored in terms of the 'extent' of the agreement. While the main points are clear, the essay would benefit from more detailed examples or a more nuanced discussion of the counter-argument to reach a higher band. The position is consistent throughout the essay, and the conclusion effectively summarizes the main argument.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. There is a basic progression of ideas from health to technology. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or missing. For example, the transition between the first and second body paragraphs is abrupt, and some sentences lack logical connectors (e.g., 'In farming modren machines are better seeds...'). Referencing is occasionally unclear, and the punctuation errors—such as missing spaces after periods—hinder the flow of the text. Improved use of linking words would enhance the overall coherence.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the range and precision required for higher bands. There are frequent spelling errors (e.g., 'beleive', 'thhe', 'healtjier', 'soceity', 'modren', 'mosat', 'whilw'). While the student uses some topic-specific vocabulary like 'vaccines', 'poverty', and 'climate change', the overall lexical range is limited. The repetition of simple structures and basic word choices prevents the essay from demonstrating a more sophisticated command of English. To improve, the student should focus on accurate spelling and incorporating more varied, academic vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay relies primarily on simple sentence structures. While there are attempts at complex sentences, they are often marred by grammatical inaccuracies, such as missing articles ('the main goal of the science') and subject-verb agreement issues ('science make our lives'). Punctuation is a significant issue, with many sentences lacking proper spacing after full stops, which makes the text difficult to read. There are frequent errors in basic grammar that, while not completely impeding communication, occur throughout the response. A greater focus on sentence variety and proofreading for basic grammatical rules is necessary.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.