Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-07
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
It is believed that most crucial aim of science should be enhance individual's live I strongly agree with this statement as science provides numerous advantages to well-being.
To commence with , out of plethora of its merits the primary one is , science means technology . In today's era , science makes the human life effortless. Invention of mobile phones are beneficial to stay connected with loved ones. Moreover, advanced vehicles are one of the grateful thing for society and it is the combination of physics, chemistry and artificial-intelligence. Furthermore, environmental studies are useful to protect environment. For instance, it encourage people to adopt eco-friendly habits. To illustrate, citizens are becoming aware about the hazardous effects of plastic. Hence, they use paper bags instead of plastic bags. Consequently, it prevent harmful gases rising from burning of plastic as a result it is fruitful for individual's health.
while some members of society, argue that it has few setbacks as it reduced the job opportunities because nowadays everything is running automatically with the support of science while other subjects such as humanities and arts preserve the conventional skills of humans. They help to enhance extra skills of person. To exemplify, dancing gives a chance to improve extra skills as well as to take a break from daily routine and refresh our mind. Individual become multitalented.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that aim of science should be to improve people's live as it provides multiple advantages and also help to protect earth's environment. However, other subjects give a chance to boost other skills as well.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position. However, the development of ideas is somewhat uneven. While the benefits of science are discussed with examples like mobile phones and environmental awareness, the counter-argument regarding humanities and arts is less effectively integrated into the overall argument. The connection between the counter-argument and the prompt's focus on science is slightly tenuous, as the essay shifts focus to the benefits of arts rather than directly addressing why science might not be the most important aim. To reach a higher band, ensure that every paragraph directly supports or qualifies your central thesis.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear progression of ideas. Cohesive devices such as 'To commence with', 'Moreover', 'Furthermore', and 'In conclusion' are used to guide the reader. However, some transitions are used mechanically, and there are instances where the flow is slightly disrupted by awkward phrasing, such as 'out of plethora of its merits'. Referencing is generally clear, but the logical link between the second and third paragraphs could be strengthened to create a more cohesive argument.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks precision and sophistication. There are several instances of awkward collocations and word choice errors, such as 'grateful thing' instead of 'beneficial invention' and 'enhance individual's live' instead of 'improve people's lives'. While the student attempts to use some topic-specific vocabulary like 'artificial-intelligence' and 'eco-friendly', the overall range is limited. To improve, focus on using more precise academic vocabulary and ensuring correct word forms (e.g., 'individual's lives' instead of 'live').
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede the flow. Common issues include missing articles (e.g., 'protect environment'), subject-verb agreement errors (e.g., 'Invention of mobile phones are'), and incorrect pluralization (e.g., 'individual's live'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the placement of commas. While the meaning is generally clear, the frequency of these errors prevents the writing from reaching a higher band. Focusing on basic grammatical accuracy and proofreading for article usage would be highly beneficial.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.