Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is undeniable that science is a giant umbrella that covers the vast expanse of knowledge. It has primarily been used in various ways for the betterment of people’s lives, such as advancements in the health sector and the invention of countless machines and robots that aid us in our daily lives. This essay will provide insight as to why I wholeheartedly agree with the notion that science should be used for improving people’s living standards.

To commence with, in recent years, due to profound research into the human body by scientists, there have been giant leaps in the vast availability of treatments and cures being discovered for many previously incurable diseases. For instance, the treatment and management of the increasingly prevalent disease known as diabetes have become widely accessible and very cost-effective. This is made possible due to the constant advancements in the field of science.

Furthermore, with the advent of various machines and robots, the daily menial and difficult tasks have become easier and more efficient to perform. For example, the invention of the modern car has provided man with luxuries that were unimaginable a couple centuries ago. Another example would be the introduction of the smartphone, which has made long-distance communication hassle-free and efficient. This would not be achievable without the use of science.

In conclusion, science has allowed us to become healthier and live more efficiently due to the invention of modern medicines and many advanced machines and gadgets. Thus, taking into consideration the benefits that science has provided for humans, I fully agree that the primary focus of scientists should be improving our quality of life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout. You have provided relevant examples, such as medical advancements and the impact of smartphones, to support your argument. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While the points are relevant, they could be extended further by discussing potential counter-arguments or the ethical implications of science, which would demonstrate a more nuanced understanding. The essay is well-structured and directly answers the 'to what extent' question by consistently supporting the idea that science should prioritize human welfare.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the progression of ideas is easy to follow. You use cohesive devices such as 'To commence with,' 'Furthermore,' and 'In conclusion' effectively to link your points. However, the transition between the introduction and the first body paragraph could be smoother. The use of referencing is generally clear, and the paragraphing is appropriate for the length of the essay. Overall, the flow of information is coherent and easy to navigate.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'undeniable,' 'profound research,' and 'prevalent.' There is an attempt to use less common items, though some phrasing is slightly repetitive or generic, such as 'giant umbrella' or 'giant leaps.' The word choices are generally accurate and do not impede communication. To reach a higher band, you should aim to incorporate more sophisticated collocations and topic-specific terminology related to the philosophy of science or societal impact to show greater precision and flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The essay displays a good mix of simple and complex sentence structures. Most sentences are error-free, and your control over punctuation is generally strong. There are no significant grammatical errors that impede meaning. You successfully use complex structures, such as 'taking into consideration the benefits that science has provided,' which adds variety. To improve, you could experiment with a wider range of subordinating conjunctions and more varied sentence beginnings to enhance the overall sophistication of your writing. The current level of accuracy is consistent throughout the text.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.