Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

For improving individuals' lives, few things are more crucial than science. In any developed and developing countries, a substantial amount of money is allocated to science, as it often necessitates the use of various resources, such as microscopes, computers, software, and so on. Nowadays, many would agree that contemporary society has nearly transcended its traditional boundaries and will soon become boundless in its pursuit of science for the enrichment of people's lives. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that persons lives should be improved through the science.

Naturally, science in the form of development is considered more essential for individuals' lives, creating inexhaustible facilities for living standards that are not available from other sources. Moreover, it demonstrates unparalleled benefits for citizens lives, permeating and enhancing every conceivable sector of society. Since people seek development and fulfillment through science, ample investment in science is imperative to elevate modern living standers. If this is adopted by governments and individuals alike, many people stand to benefit significantly science in nations such as China and Japan, for instance, has emerged as a pivotal model for development, delivering enhanced services for their science.

Under certain circumstances, persons lives may shy away from science due to a range of challenges, such as mental and physical health crises, financial conditions, technological barriers, resource limitations, fear of failure, and lack of support. While science is widely embraced in many major cities worldwide, people's lives in impoverished and developing nations frequently contend with profound financial limitations and deteriorating conditions when striving to implement this approach. Therefore, the notion of science is not always appealing. From economic, social, and national perspectives, if the goals of persons dictate that science is not merely an option but an imperative, they may choose to embrace it.

However, it is the responsibility of peoples to evaluate the role of science and determine whether it will do ore harm than good. Thus, it is evident that fostering an interest in science is beneficial.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt, but the development of ideas is inconsistent. While you state a position, the arguments are often vague and lack specific, logical support. For example, the mention of Japan and China is a good start, but the explanation of how they use science to deliver 'enhanced services for their science' is unclear and repetitive. The third paragraph introduces interesting points about barriers to science, but these are not clearly linked back to the central question of whether science's primary aim should be improving lives. To improve, ensure each paragraph has a clear topic sentence and provides concrete, logical evidence that directly supports your thesis.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the logical progression between ideas is sometimes weak. You use some cohesive devices like 'Moreover' and 'Nevertheless', but they are occasionally used in ways that do not quite fit the context, making the flow feel mechanical. Additionally, some sentences are repetitive, such as the frequent use of 'people's lives' and 'science', which makes the argument feel circular rather than progressive. Improving the use of referencing and ensuring that each sentence builds logically upon the previous one will significantly enhance the coherence of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using words like 'imperative', 'unparalleled', and 'necessitates'. However, there are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'persons lives', 'modern living standers' (likely a spelling error for 'standards'), and 'do ore harm' (typo). The repetition of 'science' and 'people's lives' throughout the essay limits your score. To reach a higher band, focus on using more precise vocabulary and synonyms to avoid repetition, and ensure that your word choices are natural and contextually accurate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While you attempt complex sentences, they often contain errors that affect clarity, such as 'many people stand to benefit significantly science in nations such as China...'. There are frequent errors in punctuation and grammar, particularly with possessives (e.g., 'persons lives' instead of 'people's lives') and subject-verb agreement. While these errors do not completely prevent the reader from understanding your message, they occur frequently enough to impact the overall fluency. Focusing on basic grammatical accuracy and proofreading for small errors will help improve your score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.