Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

For improving individuals' lives, few things are more crucial than science. In many developed and developing countries, a substantial amount of money is allocated to science, as it often necessitates the use of various resources, such as microscopes, computers, software, and so on. Nowadays, many would agree that contemporary society has nearly transcended its traditional boundaries and will soon become boundless in its pursuit of science for the enrichment of people's lives. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that persons lives should be improved through science.

Naturally, science in the form of development is considered more essential for individuals' lives, creating inexhaustible facilities for living standards that are not available from other sources. Moreover, it demonstrates unparalleled benefits for citizens' lives, permeating and enhancing every conceivable sector of society. Since peoples seek development and fulfillment through science, ample investment in science is imperative to elevate modern living standards. If this is adopted by governments and individuals' alike, many people stand to benefit significantly science; in nations such as China and Japan, for instance, has emerged as a pivotal model for development, delivering enhanced services for their science.

Under certain circumstances, persons' lives may shy away from science due to a range of challenges, such as mental and physical health crises, financial conditions, technological barriers, resource limitations, fear of failure, and lack of support. While science is widely embraced in many major cities worldwide, people's lives in impoverished and developing nations frequently contend with profound financial limitations and deteriorating conditions when striving to implement this approach. Therefore, the notion of science is not always appealing. From economic, social, and national perspectives, if the goals of persons' dictate that science is not merely an option but an imperative, they may choose to embrace it.

However, it is the responsibility of peoples' to evaluate the role of science and determine whether it will do ore harm than good. Thus, it is evident that fostering an interest in science is beneficial.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt, but the development of ideas is inconsistent. While you state a position, the arguments in the second and third paragraphs are somewhat abstract and lack clear, logical progression. For instance, the mention of Japan and China is vague and does not clearly explain how science specifically improves lives in those contexts. The third paragraph introduces a counter-argument regarding challenges, but it does not effectively link back to the main thesis of whether science's primary aim should be improving lives. To improve, ensure each paragraph has a clear topic sentence and specific, concrete examples that directly support your stance.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the logical flow between sentences is often disjointed. While you use some cohesive devices like 'Moreover' and 'Nevertheless', their usage is sometimes mechanical or contextually awkward. For example, the transition into the third paragraph regarding 'challenges' feels abrupt. Additionally, the referencing is occasionally unclear, such as the phrase 'if this is adopted' in the second paragraph, which lacks a precise antecedent. Improving the use of linking words to show clearer relationships between ideas and ensuring that each paragraph builds logically upon the previous one will help improve your score.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary, including terms like 'necessitates', 'contemporary', and 'imperative'. However, there are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'persons lives' (should be 'people's lives'), 'peoples seek' (should be 'people seek'), and 'do ore harm' (typo for 'more'). The repetition of 'science' and 'people's lives' throughout the essay suggests a limited range of synonyms. To reach a higher band, focus on using more precise vocabulary and ensuring that word forms and collocations are accurate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Common issues include incorrect pluralization (e.g., 'individuals' alike', 'peoples''), missing articles, and awkward phrasing like 'delivering enhanced services for their science'. Punctuation is generally functional, but there are errors in apostrophe usage throughout the text. While the meaning is usually understandable, the frequency of these errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Focus on proofreading for basic subject-verb agreement and consistent use of articles.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.