Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Science has changed the whole living structure of of the globe. It is widely argued that the primary goal of science should be to enhance the well-being in people’s lives. I firmly agree with this statement because all the researches and experiments have done for the sake to make people’s lives easier in every manners

Firstly, science has got great achievements in field of healthcare. For example, scientist have made vaccines for different disease, which helps countless people to save them from deadly diseases. Furthermore, now doctors have more modern instruments and machines to cure or diagnose different illnesses in better way. Therefore, life expectancy of individuals increase in many countries. Moreover, different digital applications are helping students and teachers to learn the difficult concepts in different ways .

Secondly, not just medical sciences are helpful but computer science and other technologies are helping the people in best way. For instance, The invention of mobile phone has changed the whole living structure of people’s lives. Now it is available to everyone, they can communicate with each other and can do many other difficult task on it by using applications in it. In addition to it, scientist are now more focused on space science and with the aim to get a better planet for humans. Hence, we can say that it is obvious that every inventions in any scientific field will lead to betterment in human’s lives.

In a nutshell, I would argue that there are many other goals behind every research and invention but ultimately it helps to make our lives easier and better in every sense.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt clearly and maintains a consistent position throughout. The ideas are relevant, focusing on healthcare and technology as evidence for the benefits of science. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat superficial. For instance, the mention of space science is brief and lacks a clear connection to the prompt's core argument about improving daily lives. To reach a higher band, you should provide more nuanced examples or explore the potential counter-arguments to show a deeper understanding of the topic. The conclusion is clear but could be more reflective of the arguments presented.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is logically organized into clear paragraphs, each with a distinct focus. You use cohesive devices such as 'Firstly', 'Furthermore', 'Moreover', and 'In a nutshell' to guide the reader through your arguments. However, the use of these devices is sometimes mechanical or repetitive. Additionally, there are minor issues with referencing and flow, such as the phrase 'all the researches and experiments have done', which disrupts the logical progression. Improving the variety of your linking words and ensuring smoother transitions between sentences would enhance the overall coherence of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'well-being', 'life expectancy', and 'diagnose'. However, there are several instances of awkward phrasing and word choice errors, such as 'living structure of the globe' and 'in every manners'. Some collocations are also imprecise, such as 'science has got great achievements'. To improve, focus on using more precise academic vocabulary and ensuring that your word choices are natural and contextually appropriate. Expanding your range to include more sophisticated synonyms would also help elevate your score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement ('scientist have made', 'life expectancy... increase') and article usage ('in field of healthcare'). There are also some punctuation and spelling issues, such as the double 'of of' in the opening sentence. While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. Focusing on proofreading for basic grammatical accuracy and refining your use of complex structures will be beneficial.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.